Laserfiche WebLink
Development Services <br /> Memorandum <br /> Preapplication Applications for <br /> SII-92-6/GP-92-8/ZR-92-8 <br /> Page 2 <br /> SERVICES: <br /> Under the site's existing General Plan and zoning designations, <br /> provisions must be made for on-site services: individual wells for <br /> drinking water, septic tanks for sewage disposal, and on-site storm <br /> drainage. With the proposed designations and parcels of two acres <br /> or larger, on-site services may be allowed. In the event that <br /> parcel sizes are less than two acres, public water and storm <br /> drainage systems are required in order to develop with septic <br /> tanks. <br /> The applicant's proposal to develop the project with on-site <br /> services could only be permitted if all the parcels contain two or <br /> more acres. Development of the project with septic tanks may only <br /> be permitted subject to securing an approved Septic Suitability <br /> Study. In order for the full application for Zone Reclassification <br /> to be deemed complete, the Environmental Health Division must <br /> approve the applicant's Septic Suitability Study. <br /> NOISE: <br /> Based upon projected CNEL noise contours for 2005, neither State <br /> Route 99 to the east of the site or the Southern Pacific Railroad <br /> tracks to the west will have an adverse impact on the proposed <br /> subdivision. However, noise analysis conducted for the Woodson <br /> Estates Environmental Impact Report indicates that the noise <br /> contour for one cF the Lodi Airport's runways may expose the <br /> western portion of the project site to noise levels in excess of <br /> the 65 db Ldn permitted by the Planning Title. In the event that <br /> staff is not able to verify the location of the noise contour, the <br /> applicant may be required to perform the necessary noise analysis <br /> to establish its location. <br /> LAND USE: <br /> The development of the site with residential uses is not expected <br /> to result in any significant land use conflicts, given the existing <br /> rural residential uses to the north and east, the scattered <br /> residential uses to the west, and the residential development on <br /> Meadow Creek Court to the south. However, the presence of this <br /> subdivision immediately adjacent to the agricultural lands to the <br /> south could possibly result in specific land use conflicts that <br /> would have to be mitigated. The conflicts could include the effect <br /> of agricultural practices on residents of the subdivision and the <br /> reduction of agricultural viability due to limitations on <br /> agricultural operations. <br />