Laserfiche WebLink
Steve Gikas and Lori Gikas -2- 19 August 2013 <br /> Golden Gate Nut Company/California Nuggets, Inc. <br /> 1. The discharge has caused pollution (i.e., exceedance of water quality objectives) for nitrate <br /> precursors, total dissolved solids, iron, manganese, and chloride. The Central Valley Water <br /> Board cannot allow this pollution to continue or get worse. <br /> 2. The likely cause of the pollution is over application of high strength wastewater to the 5.2- <br /> acre land application area (LAA). Over application of wastewater has the following effects. <br /> • Nitrogen overloading. which causes excess nitrate and nitrate precursors to <br /> accumulate in the soil; <br /> • Prolonged saturation with high biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) wastewater, <br /> which causes iron and manganese in the soil to dissolve; and <br /> • Forced percolation of the excess nitrogen, salts, dissolved organic matter. and <br /> metals to shallow groundwater. <br /> Planned Improvements <br /> Golden Gate Nut Company must remedy the causes of pollution as soon as practical. The RWD <br /> states that the following improvements will be implemented: <br /> 1. Segregation of oil recycling wastewater for off-site disposal to reduce BOD and salts, <br /> 2. Installation of a treatment system to remove BOD and nitrogen, <br /> 3. Planting alfalfa in the LAA to maximize nutrient and water uptake, <br /> 4. Installation of sprinkler nozzles that will enhance evaporation, <br /> 5. Planting trees around the LAA perimeter to improve water uptake, and <br /> 6. Lining the existing storm water pond for use as additional wastewater storage <br /> The RWD does not specify when these measures will be implemented. Because the discharge <br /> has caused pollution, the WDRs must include a specific time schedule for completion of all work <br /> required to bring the discharge into compliance with the Basin Plan. Additionally, the RWD does <br /> not contain information showing that proposed improvements will be sufficient to stop the causes <br /> of pollution. Specifically, the information presented in the RWD Addendum indicates that the total <br /> land application area should be at least 12 acres planted with alfalfa to ensure nitrogen and water <br /> loading at rates consistent with crop needs However, this estimate does not consider protective <br /> loading rates for BOD and salts, and it is likely that more than 12 acres would be required to stop <br /> the cause of pollution and restore shallow groundwater quality to concentrations that do not <br /> exceed the water quality objectives <br /> Request for Additional Information <br /> Water Code section 13267 states, in relevant part: <br /> ... the regional board may require that any person who has discharged, discharges, or is <br /> suspected of having discharged or discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste <br /> within its region . .shall furnish, under penalty of perjury, technical or monitoring program <br /> reports which the regional board requires. The burden, including costs, of these reports <br /> shall bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the report and the benefits to be <br /> obtained from the reports. In requiring those reports, the regional board shall provide the <br /> person with a written explanation with regard to the need for the reports, and shall <br /> identify the evidence that supports requiring that person to provide the reports. <br />