My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FUHRMAN
>
24400
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500219
>
SU0004999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:24 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:44:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004999
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500219
STREET_NUMBER
24400
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
FUHRMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
02104812
ENTERED_DATE
4/20/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
24400 N FUHRMAN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
5/3/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FUHRMAN\24400\PA-0500219\SU0004999\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FUHRMAN\24400\PA-0500219\SU0004999\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FUHRMAN\24400\PA-0500219\SU0004999\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FUHRMAN\24400\PA-0500219\SU0004999\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECF��RD <br /> Thomas and Mary McInerney lye y <br /> 24311 N. Fuhrman Rd. C 0 3 7005 <br /> n <br /> Acampo, CA 95220 mfnunity De yeiopment Dept <br /> April 29, 2005 <br /> Ms.Kathy Allen <br /> San Joaquin County Community <br /> Development Department <br /> Development Services Division <br /> 1810 E. Hazelton Ave. <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Re: Use Permit Application#PA-0500219(UP) <br /> Property Owner: Suzanne Schenk <br /> 24400 Fuhrman Rd. <br /> Acampo, CA 95220 <br /> Dear Ms. Allen: <br /> This correspondence is in response to the application of Suzanne Schenk for a dog kennel <br /> at the above address which is located across the street from our home. <br /> We are vehemently opposed to this request for numerous reasons which are outlined <br /> below. <br /> 1. DOGS NOT CONFINED <br /> On many occasions the dogs located at Ms. Schenk's home have been out on the road <br /> that runs in front of our home. We have had one or two of her dogs on our fenced property and <br /> had to run them off. There is one small dog that is allowed out on the road frequently, and when <br /> we drive to our mailbox at the end of our property, we are constantly worried we might <br /> accidently hit her. This is not an everyday occurrence but has been ongoing from the day she <br /> moved in to her home. She will attempt to correct the problem but has never been able to keep <br /> them completely confined. Many of the dogs she acquires are strays per her own admission. I <br /> am fearful that these animals may bite and do not feel comfortable getting out of my car if they <br /> are loose. On one occasion last summer, there was a screaming incident at her home where we <br /> thought she was seriously injured and no one felt safe entering her property because her dogs <br /> were out and we were afraid of them. We ultimately called the sheriff because no one felt <br /> comfortable going on her property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.