My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002246 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
16450
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-98-18
>
SU0002246 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:08 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:00:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0002246
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-98-18
STREET_NUMBER
16450
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
16450 E HARNEY LN
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HARNEY\16450\UP-98-18\SU0002246\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Description <br /> F = Flow in gpd <br /> h = Hours of detention <br /> Hl = Hours per day (24) <br /> C = Capacity of aeration chamber(to level of weir) <br /> ]Vitrification addition: <br /> Given: Maximum NH., expected: 27.5 <br /> Desired: 27.5 to 26.5 = 94.5%removed <br /> so 26.5 x 4.2 02 = 11 1.3 mg/L(lbs)of 02 is required for conversion. <br /> CLARIFIER SIZING <br /> Sedimentation is based upon detention capacity design. Since the entire volume of mixed liquor <br /> in aeration standby (batch) is physically transferred into the clarifier, settling time may be ad- <br /> justed to allow even the smallest particle to settle. <br /> Unlike a conventional flowthrough clarifier, where the surface area must be Iarge enough to al- <br /> low particles to settle downward in a constantly moving stream, the batch clarifier provides parti- <br /> cle settling under completely static, quiescent conditions. This method is more efficient and eco- <br /> nomical than meeting the need in flowthrough systems for greater surface_areas with increasing <br /> flow rates at larger capacities. <br /> With the batch process, the static clarifier does not require this larger surface area; therefore, in <br /> design, the batch clarifier volume capacity is equal to the mixed-liquor volume, or batch, to be <br /> transferred. <br /> Surface Settling Rate (SSR) does apply, however, but only on a batch-by-batch basis. SSR are <br /> based upon flow in static conditions and are thus accurate for the 24-hour period flow. The Nitro- <br /> Raptor.batch process is unique in that longer retention times are not required to do the accurate <br /> sludge volume results obtained in the standard SSV-30 and SSV-60 tests.By staying within those <br /> basic design parameters of SSR per batch,the static condition of the batch clarification process is <br /> directly comparable to settleometer readings. <br /> Complete control of the entire process can be based upon the SSV-30 and -60 tests. When the <br /> sludge flocculates well and settles rapidly, the 7-H TC2K Computerized Monitoring and Control <br /> System through process monitoring probes will allow for automatic sequencing of the batch cycle <br /> based upon current biomass conditions within the treatmentplant. This change can increase or <br /> decrease aeration detention and the subsequent clarifier cycle surface settling rate. <br /> The clarifier has a dual-weir system for removal and return of floatables to aeration. The weir <br /> system is sized using hydraulic return/surface area(square feet). One hundred percent of all weir <br /> wastewater is returned to aeration and thus is contained within the internal detention time of the <br /> treatment process. Provisions are made to ensure that any residual floatable scum is not trans- <br /> ferred into any downstream process by SNT pump elevation control. <br /> FLOW EQUAL17ATION <br /> Widely fluctuating influent flow rates are typical at nearly all wastewater treatment plants. This <br /> fluctuation can result in a loss of treatment efficiency. With higher degrees of treatment con- <br /> stantly being required, some method of flow equalization is a design necessity. <br /> - 14- <br /> 7-H Technical Services Group,Inc. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.