Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS K AND L INITIAL STUDY 5.ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC <br /> P <br /> I <br /> Table 5.15-12 Changes IN INTERSECTION DELAYS-PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOODS <br /> Fi K AND L PROJECT COMPARED TO APPROVED NEIGHBORHOODS K <br /> AND L PROJECT <br /> { AM PM <br /> i 1 Changes in Changes in <br /> Peak Hour Peak Hour <br /> Delay Delay <br /> Intersections (seconds) seconds <br /> 1 Mountain House Parkway/Central Parkway -6.0 02 <br /> 2 Mountain House Parkway/Neighborhood L Loop(w) -3.2 -0.5 <br /> Fi <br /> 3 Mountain House Parkway/Neighborhood L Loop(e) -2.5 3.7 <br /> 4 Mountain House Parkway/Bethany Road extension -1.0 7.6 <br /> 5 Mountain House Parkway/Byron Road 12.2 -4.1 <br /> F 6 Mountain House Parkway/Mascot Boulevard -0.4 0.5 <br /> 7 Mountain House ParkwaylGrant Line Road -1.9 8.8 <br /> 8 Mountain House Parkwayll-205 Westbound Ramps 0.6 0.6 <br /> Fj9 Mountain House Parkwayll-205 Eastbound Ramps -3.0 11.1 <br /> i 10 Grant Line Road/Central Parkway 0.0 0.3 <br /> 11 Grant Line RoadlGreat Valley Parkway 0.1 4.5 <br /> 12 Great Valley Parkway/Mascot Boulevard -0.8 0.3 <br /> Fj13 Great Valley Parkway/Main Street 0.0 0.1 <br /> 14 Great Valley Parkway/De Anza Boulevard 1.2 0.4 <br /> i <br /> 15 Great Valley ParkwaylKelso Road -0.3 2.7 <br /> I <br /> 16 Great Valley Parkway/Byron Road 1.2 -1.3 <br /> 17 Great Valley ParkwaylCentral Parkway 2.3 1.6 <br /> F1- 18 Great Valley Parkway/Neighborhood K Loop Rd(w) 1.9 0.1 <br /> Source: TJKM,2011. <br /> As already provided by adopted Mitigation Measure M4.12-1, countywide TSM <br /> t-- and TDM programs are to be designed and implemented to promote and <br /> ( facilitate the use of non-auto modes of travel in the county(see further <br /> discussion of TDM under Item(f)below). <br /> Currently,a TDM coordinator operates on-site at the MHCSD office. An annual <br /> Transportation Monitoring Program has been conducted for the past few years. <br /> The report includes traffic counts and level of service analysis on all community <br /> gateways and other affected County roads. The report also includes analysis of <br /> I' the adequacy of the near-term trigger points and reports on the progress toward <br /> implementation of the required transportation improvements. Due to the <br /> Fj <br /> (sm„) 5-187 <br /> Flit <br /> 44' <br />