SU0006109 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY `j COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1510 E.HAZELTON AVE.,3TOCKTON,CA 85205-6232 ,• C4 July 19, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Development Committee FROM: Rick Griffin 6 Associate Planner SUBJECT: MAJOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION NO. PA-0600346 OF CIRCLE JM DAIRY, INC. (C/O MOYER CONSULTING) (APN: 257-150-02, 257-220-07, 12, 13, AND 14; ADDRESS: 26626 S. MANTECA ROAD, MANTECA) This project is a Major Subdivision application for a vesting tentative map to re-subdivide 21 parcels that total 395.75 acres into 17 parcels of two acres each, one parcel of 40 acres, one parcel of 43.63 acres, one parcel of 109.61 acres, and one parcel of 160.78 acres. The project is located on the east side of S. Manteca Road and the north and south sides of E. Melton Road, 3.2 miles south of the City of Manteca. The Community Development Department has reviewed the project and offers the following comments. Density Development Title Section 9-905.9 (a) states that the area and width of lots or parcels in a subdivision map shall conform to the particular zoning district in which the property is located. Therefore, new parcels in the AG-40 zone must be a minimum of forty acres. However, Section 9-905.9(e)(2) states that any subdivision map that redesigns an existing subdivision in which the density of lots is not increased is not subject to the requirements of Section 9-905.9(@-d). There are twenty-four (24) legal lots within the five parcel numbers submitted with this application. These parcels are part of two antiquated subdivisions, Bret Harte Gardens and Melton Tract. The tentative map dated June 15, 2006 indicates the redesign of the twenty-four (24) lots into twenty-one (21) lots. Fewer lots means the density has decreased and therefore the subdivision is not required to conform to the forty acre minimum lot size requirement of the AG-40 zone. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District The Community Development Department sent a referral to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (APCD) on June 23, 2006. The APCD responded in a memo dated June 30, 2006. The memo states that the project is located in close proximity to three major dairies. As a result of the location, the 17 proposed residential homes may be considered sensitive receptors. There may be health risks to future occupants due to the emissions produced through normal