My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004098
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
35775
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0300550
>
SU0004098
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004098
PE
2605
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0300550
STREET_NUMBER
35775
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
35775 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
3/10/2004 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\35775\PA-0300550\SU0004098\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\35775\PA-0300550\SU0004098\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\35775\PA-0300550\SU0004098\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\35775\PA-0300550\SU0004098\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
683
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Joaquin County Community Other CEQA Considerations <br /> Development Department <br /> additional quarry operation in this area of the County. The proposed Project <br /> would introduce several prominent new visual elements into the viewshed,and <br /> the aesthetics of the site would be altered during operations from the existing — <br /> agricultural character to the character of an aggregate extraction and processing <br /> facility. <br /> However,the change in views of the site is not anticipated to result in substantial — <br /> degradation of the aesthetics of the project site, such that the Project would <br /> contribute to an overall degradation in the visual appearance of the area,because <br /> the proposed quarry operation would be of similar size and duration as the other <br /> existing quarries in the vicinity. The Project includes construction of perimeter <br /> berms and implementation of a landscaping plan that would reduce the <br /> cumulative contribution of the Project to overall aesthetic impacts. — <br /> Implementation of the Project-specific mitigation measure discussed in <br /> Chapter 3.A would further reduce the Project's visual impacts by requiring that <br /> the operator develop and implement a nighttime lighting plan prior to nighttime <br /> operations at the site. <br /> Further, the Project includes a reclamation plan for the site that would occur in — <br /> stages, concurrent with mining operations. With final reclamation of the site,a <br /> total of 165 acres would have been reclaimed to agricultural use(Figure 2-6). As <br /> site operations progress through the project stages,the previously mined areas _ <br /> would be reclaimed to support an agricultural end use,consistent with the <br /> existing agricultural uses of the site. The reclamation plan does not identify a <br /> specific type of agricultural end use because this would be too speculative over <br /> the 40-year projected operating life of the quarry. <br /> The proposed Project's contribution to aesthetic impacts would be less than <br /> cumulatively considerable. — <br /> Land Use and Planning and Agricultural Resources <br /> Impact CE-2: Cumulative Displacement of Existing or <br /> Proposed Land Uses (Cumulatively Considerable) <br /> Several existing and planned quarry sites are located in the project vicinity <br /> (Figure 2-5), including the Teichert Aggregates' Vernalis quarry,the DSS Traina — <br /> quarry,Granite Construction's Vernalis quarry,West Coast Aggregates' quarry <br /> (QX 86-2), and RMC Pacific Materials proposed site. These other quarry <br /> projects are separated from the proposed Project; therefore,there would be no — <br /> cumulative effects on adjacent land uses because the proposed Project has no <br /> lands in common with these quarries. However,the other mining projects do <br /> involve displacement of existing or proposed land uses(primarily agricultural — <br /> production)because they have created, or will create, mined slopes and/or ponds. <br /> Existing land uses on sites proposed for mining include agricultural uses and <br /> undisturbed open space containing native vegetation. The Project would — <br /> contribute to this cumulative impact. No feasible mitigation exists that would <br /> DeSilva Gates Quarry Project — <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 5-4 <br /> AS 051D&M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.