My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We had our own sound study done by J.C. Brennan & Associates <br /> Acoustical Engineering with over 25 years experience, and with the <br /> meter placed in our own backyard which continuously monitored the <br /> plant day and night with results showing that this plant is indeed <br /> exceeding their noise limits. <br /> We would also like to point out that in the letter sent to us by Kerry <br /> Sullivan dated July 29, 2011 it states on point #4 that, "During the <br /> extended hours of operation, the trucking company will have a <br /> representative monitor the project trucks to ensure that they utilize <br /> practices recognized to reduce noise impacts to the maximum extent <br /> feasible" yet on the gravel plants own sound study and although the <br /> plant owns the trucking company, it states on Page 7 that "several of <br /> the returning trucks were observed to be traveling at speeds above <br /> those recommended in the optimized procedure." If at a time when <br /> the plant knew all would be watching them, they couldn't control their <br /> trucks and utilize recommended mitigation methods, why would you <br /> expect them to do this at any another time? <br /> In closing, we would like to ask that you consider our voice because we <br /> are the only true witnesses to what is actually happening in this <br /> situation. <br /> Marty and Diana Adrian <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.