Laserfiche WebLink
Noise Mitigation for the Noise Path <br /> The final option for noise mitigation involves treating the sound transmission path through the <br /> introduction of noise barriers between the noise source and path. However, due to the wide <br /> range of exposures, orientation of residences, and other constraints, the construction of solid <br /> noise barriers at existing residences located along East River Road would not be a viable option <br /> for this project, CMq is not re con,imendeef.. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Relative to nighttime operations which have historically occurred at the Munn & Perkins site, the <br /> proposed continuation of those operations during nighttime hours as needed to service night .. <br /> paving projects would not constitute any appreciable change in nighttime noise environments. <br /> In addition, existing nighttime heavy truck usage along East River Road which is not associated <br /> with the Munn & Perkins operation currently presents the potential for noise impacts within <br /> residences located along that roadway. Nonetheless, this analysis concludes that, without <br /> mitigation, the potential for noise impacts associated with the production and delivery of asphalt <br /> paving materials from the Munn & Perkins facility on East River Road during nighttime hours . <br /> would be present at some existing residences located along East River Road for a relatively <br /> small number of nights per year. <br /> Because historic data pertaining to nighttime operations indicates an average of 11 nights per <br /> year of night operations between 1999 and 2005 (a total of 3% of the nights in the year), with a <br /> high of 26 nights of operation in 2004 (a total of 7% of the nights that year), it is important to <br /> note that night operations have been very infrequent. <br /> Relative to ambient noise conditions present on nights when there are no nighttime operations .... <br /> at the Munn & Perkins facility, nighttime operations would result in higher noise levels. This <br /> analysis concludes that such operations could result in noticeable noise increases at the <br /> exterior areas of existing residences located along East River Road, between McHenry Avenue <br /> and Santa Fe Road. However, increased noise levels during the relatively few nights per year <br /> that night-paving contracts require the production and delivery of materials during nighttime <br /> hours do not necessarily translate to adverse noise impacts at those outdoor locations as most <br /> people are not outside during those quietest hours of midnight to 2 a.m. <br /> The potential for adverse noise impacts due to the project would be present primarily within <br /> residences within 115 feet of East River Road with bedroom windows open and facing the <br /> roadway (please see Table 8). The likelihood of the potential sleep disturbance impact is a <br /> function of several variables. Those variables include whether or not residents were pre-notified <br /> of the nighttime operations, the number and distribution of heavy trucks during nighttime paving <br /> projects, the manner in which those trucks are operated, the distance from the potentially <br /> impacted residences to the roadway, the exposure of the bedroom windows of those residences <br /> to the roadway, the degree by which bedroom windows are screened from view of the roadway <br /> by intervening noise barriers, topography, structures, and orchards, and the position of the <br /> windows (open or closed). <br /> Environmental Noise Analysis <br /> Munn & Perkins Expanded Hours of operations-San Joaquin County <br /> Page 39 <br />