Laserfiche WebLink
The second source of information used was the Geotracker System maintained by the State <br /> Water Resources Control Board. This System illustrates all underground fuel storage tanks <br /> and leaking underground storage tanks. The map found in Appendix D indicates there is a <br /> leaking underground storage tank one mile to the west of the site and three leaking tanks six <br /> miles to the east of the site. None of these leaking tanks could affect groundwater under the <br /> site due to the distances involved. The leaking tank to the west of the site can be <br /> considered downgradient, again due to groundwater directional flow. <br /> The third informational gathering method source is the Environmental Questionnaire found <br /> in Appendix C. This documents environmental information directly from the people most <br /> knowledgeable about site, namely Mr. Chavez and Mr. Dutra. These two gentlemen were <br /> also interviewed for completion of this Report. <br /> The fourth informational source for agricultural pesticide documentation and environmental <br /> fate data was obtained from the University of California at Davis and Oregon State <br /> University Extoxnet System. <br /> § 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of <br /> contamination identified at the project site include a concrete mixing pad where <br /> agrichemicals have been mixed in the past, and are currently mixed. However, Mr. Dutra <br /> has been extremely careful in not allowing mixed agrichemicals to spill onto the concrete <br /> pad and eventually onto the surrounding soil. Below ground contamination of the <br /> underlying aquifers from this point source cannot happen because there is an air gap <br /> between the introduction of water into the mix tank and agrichemical material. There has <br /> never been an above ground or underground fuel storage tank on the property for the length <br /> of time the Dutra's have owned the property. A tank trailer used to transport water is <br /> located west of the barn. Two existing septic tanks are on the property. Ultimately, there <br /> will be four septic tanks and leachfields on the entire property acreage of 39.52 acres, <br /> which can be considered a very low density with respect to potential nitrate impact. <br /> § 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above ground and below ground <br /> sources of contamination identified at the project site would include the listed pesticides <br /> found on the Environmental Questionnaire that have been applied to the orchard. <br /> Environmental fate data shows that the half lives of the listed materials are comparatively <br /> short and moderately persistent within the soil environment. These materials pose a minor <br /> risk to human health and the environment. There are currently seven electrical transformers <br /> on the property; to the east, south, and west of the existing residential structure. They all <br /> appear to be relatively new, and consequently unlikely to contain polychloride biphenyls <br /> (PCBs). Although no indication was noted of external oil leakage, if there was a leak or <br /> explosion, it would be the responsibility of the transformer owner to mitigate <br /> environmental contamination. <br /> Page -4- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />