Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br /> A nationwide permit 14 from the Corps of Engineers will be required for the road crossing. The <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board will require certification or waiver of water quality <br /> pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. A Notice of Intent of storm water pollution <br /> prevention plan will also be required pursuant to Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The <br /> Department of Fish and Game will require a steam bed alteration permit. In addition to these <br /> permits a 404 permit may also be required by the Corps of Engineers for construction of the <br /> flood protection berms. All storm drainage from the project will remain on site. <br /> Slope Stability: <br /> There appears to be a conflict in the report and the slope stability analysis in that the slope <br /> stability analysis provides for excavation of working slopes of up to '/. horizontal to 1 vertical. <br /> The proposed excavation plan state that the excavated slopes will be at 1% horizontal to 1 <br /> vertical. The maximum depth of excavation is approximately 80 feet. It is proposed that the <br /> slopes be reclaimed at 1% to 1. The issues include that if the slopes are excavated at % to 1 <br /> and back filled at % to 1 that a slip surface is being developed between the excavated and <br /> reclaimed slope. It will need to be demonstrated also how slopes steeper than 1%Z : 1 can be <br /> effectively revegetated. Under Development Title Section 9-1415.3(k)(4) requires slope <br /> stability factors of safety as follows: <br /> • A minimum factor of safety of 1.5 against static deep-seated failure. <br /> • A minimum factor of safety of 1.5 against static surficial failure and, <br /> • A minimum factor of safety of 1.1 against seismic failure. Temporary slopes are governed <br /> by Cal Osha and MSHA. <br /> Biological: <br /> The "Biological Resources, Impacts and Mitigation Analysis" prepared by Monk and Associate <br /> dated January 27, 1999 identifies impacts and mitigation measures for affected species. With <br /> the exception of the mitigation measures for the San Joaquin Kit Fox of CDFG finds the report <br /> acceptable. The CDFG request that mitigation measures be incorporated as conditions of <br /> approval as follows: <br /> • The mitigation provisions for San Joaquin kit fox contained in the Biological Resources <br /> Impacts and Mitigation Analysis (pages 36 through 39), and in the Kit Fox Mitigation Plan <br /> (Appendix A) should be removed and a revised mitigation plan for San Joaquin kit fox <br /> should be provided that includes the following: <br /> • Loss of kit fox habitat will be compensated in a manner such that for each acre of <br /> the project site that is mined or disturbed from mining; three acres shall be <br /> preserved. All impacts are to be considered "permanent' impacts for the purpose of <br /> these calculations. <br />