My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004097
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
32003
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0200377
>
SU0004097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:30 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:42:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004097
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0200377
STREET_NUMBER
32003
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
TRACY
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
32003 S TRACY BLVD
RECEIVED_DATE
10/4/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\TRACY\32003\PA-0200377\SU0004097\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\TRACY\32003\PA-0200377\SU0004097\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\TRACY\32003\PA-0200377\SU0004097\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Biological Resources, MONK &ASSOCIATES <br /> r Impacts and Mitigations <br /> __- Tracy Facility Expansion Site <br /> proposed project and its potential impacts to San Joaquin lit fox. During that meeting, CDFG <br /> and USFWS stated the proposed project site constitutes kit fox habitat. CDFG and USFWS then <br /> outlined kit fox mitigation requirements that the applicant would be required to incorporate into <br /> hive"incidental take permits"from these agencies for the <br /> the mining plus m order t�receive <br /> proposed project. Therefore,impacts to San Joaquin kit fox from the proposed project are <br /> considered significant and adverse. However,mitigation could be implemented that would <br /> reduce this impact to a level considered less than.significant. <br /> 1 <br /> 14.20 1Vlitig ation Measure 11 -San Joaquin Kit Fox <br /> `Implementation of the following mitigation would reduce impacts to San Joaquin kit fox to <br /> a level considered less than significant. <br /> Subsequent to Granite's Decem_ ber 20, 1993 meeting with the agencies,USFWS and CDFG <br /> at impacts to kit fox habitat could be mitigated by preserving onsite and/or offsite <br /> determined th p <br /> s to an extent considered <br /> commensurate with the <br /> habitats(hereinafter Habitat Management Lands){h <br /> types and durations of impacts that would occur to the project site. Both CDFG and USFWS <br /> requested that the applicant examine temporary impacts, long-term impacts, and permanent <br /> impacts that would occur to the project site. It was agreed that less mitigation would be required <br /> for temporary impacts and that mitigation requirements would increase for long-term temporary, <br /> and/or permanent impacts. USFWS' mitigation ratios for temporary, long-term, and permanent <br /> impacts are listed below: i <br /> 1) A 3:1 rate of compensation would be applied to all habitat losses that are considered <br /> permanent(more than 20 years from disturbance to restoration). <br /> 2) A 2:1 rate of compensation would be applied to all habitat losses that are considered <br /> long-term temporary.(10 to 20 years from disturbance to restoration). <br /> m <br /> 3) A 1.1:1 rate of coriipensation would be applied to all habitat losses that are considered <br /> short-term temporary(0 to 10 years from disturbance to restoration). <br /> To consider any habitat losses <br /> temporary,the reclamation plan for the project should include the <br /> following: <br /> 1) The restored area would remain in agricultural production of either an alfalfa/cereal <br /> grain/row crop rotation or pasture. <br /> M <br /> 2) There would be no use.of pesticides or rodenticides on slopes,berms or setback areas. <br /> 3) Slopes and berms would be seeded with a maintenance free mixture and no disturbance <br /> of these areas would be allowed after restoration is achieved. <br /> 4) Setback areas would be protected from disturbance. <br /> 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.