Laserfiche WebLink
Biological Resources, MONK &ASSOCIATES <br /> r Impacts and Mitigations <br /> __- Tracy Facility Expansion Site <br /> proposed project and its potential impacts to San Joaquin lit fox. During that meeting, CDFG <br /> and USFWS stated the proposed project site constitutes kit fox habitat. CDFG and USFWS then <br /> outlined kit fox mitigation requirements that the applicant would be required to incorporate into <br /> hive"incidental take permits"from these agencies for the <br /> the mining plus m order t�receive <br /> proposed project. Therefore,impacts to San Joaquin kit fox from the proposed project are <br /> considered significant and adverse. However,mitigation could be implemented that would <br /> reduce this impact to a level considered less than.significant. <br /> 1 <br /> 14.20 1Vlitig ation Measure 11 -San Joaquin Kit Fox <br /> `Implementation of the following mitigation would reduce impacts to San Joaquin kit fox to <br /> a level considered less than significant. <br /> Subsequent to Granite's Decem_ ber 20, 1993 meeting with the agencies,USFWS and CDFG <br /> at impacts to kit fox habitat could be mitigated by preserving onsite and/or offsite <br /> determined th p <br /> s to an extent considered <br /> commensurate with the <br /> habitats(hereinafter Habitat Management Lands){h <br /> types and durations of impacts that would occur to the project site. Both CDFG and USFWS <br /> requested that the applicant examine temporary impacts, long-term impacts, and permanent <br /> impacts that would occur to the project site. It was agreed that less mitigation would be required <br /> for temporary impacts and that mitigation requirements would increase for long-term temporary, <br /> and/or permanent impacts. USFWS' mitigation ratios for temporary, long-term, and permanent <br /> impacts are listed below: i <br /> 1) A 3:1 rate of compensation would be applied to all habitat losses that are considered <br /> permanent(more than 20 years from disturbance to restoration). <br /> 2) A 2:1 rate of compensation would be applied to all habitat losses that are considered <br /> long-term temporary.(10 to 20 years from disturbance to restoration). <br /> m <br /> 3) A 1.1:1 rate of coriipensation would be applied to all habitat losses that are considered <br /> short-term temporary(0 to 10 years from disturbance to restoration). <br /> To consider any habitat losses <br /> temporary,the reclamation plan for the project should include the <br /> following: <br /> 1) The restored area would remain in agricultural production of either an alfalfa/cereal <br /> grain/row crop rotation or pasture. <br /> M <br /> 2) There would be no use.of pesticides or rodenticides on slopes,berms or setback areas. <br /> 3) Slopes and berms would be seeded with a maintenance free mixture and no disturbance <br /> of these areas would be allowed after restoration is achieved. <br /> 4) Setback areas would be protected from disturbance. <br /> 37 <br />