Laserfiche WebLink
Pre-Design Investigation Workplan <br /> Former Manufactured Gas Plant—Lodi, California <br /> estimated void space of the dry bentonite in the annular space above the sand pack. Purge volume <br /> calculations will be recorded on soil gas sampling forms for each soil gas sample. <br /> 4.8.4 Soil Gas Purging and Sample Collection <br /> Each soil gas probe will be purged of three purge volumes (per Section 4.7.3) prior to sample <br /> collection at a consistent purge rate ranging between 100 and 200 mL/min using a pump. Vacuums <br /> less than 100" W.C. will be maintained during purging and sampling to minimize partitioning of <br /> vapors from pore water to soil gas, to prevent ambient air from diluting the soil gas samples, and to <br /> reduce the variability of purging rates. A flow meter and a vacuum gauge will be located in the <br /> sample train between the soil gas probe and the purging pump, but not in-line with the sample <br /> container. The sample container will be connected to the soil gas probe and purging line using a <br /> "tee" fitting or three-way manifold connection. <br /> Soil gas samples will be collected using 1-liter SummaTM canisters. The SummaTM canisters will be <br /> appropriately decontaminated and batch-certified by the off-site stationary analytical laboratory prior <br /> to use. An evacuated SummaTM canister will be attached to the probe tubing via a laboratory- <br /> provided manifold and other fittings assembled prior to the leak check tests. After the soil gas <br /> probe has been appropriately purged and the leak check tests completed, the soil gas sample will be <br /> collected. A flow regulator calibrated by the analytical laboratory to flow at a rate between 100 to <br /> 200 mL/min will be used to collect the soil gas sample in the SummaTM canister. A vacuum gauge <br /> will be also used to ensure a vacuum of less than 100"W.C. is maintained during sampling. <br /> Low-flow conditions may be encountered where soil gas permeability is too low to allow sustainable <br /> purging at appreciable flow rates (minimum flow of 100 mL/min) without applying excessive <br /> vacuum (greater than 100" W.C.). If low flow conditions exist, then alternative low flow sampling <br /> protocols described in Appendix D of the DTSC ASGI guidance document (DTSC, 2010) will be <br /> followed. These alternative sampling protocols allow for a minimum of 1 purge volume equal to the <br /> dead volume of the filter pack and probe tubing to be removed from the soil gas probe prior to <br /> conducting the leak test and collecting the soil gas sample. Further, purging and sampling where <br /> low-flow conditions exist due to fine-grained formations are conducted by removing an aliquot of <br /> soil gas over time to allow for dissipation of down-hole vacuum. Other alternative protocols may <br /> also include the replacement of the subject probe using different construction specifications and <br /> altering the soil gas sampling methodology. <br /> Per DTSC ASGI guidance, field quality control (QC) samples including either duplicate or replicate <br /> samples will be collected at a rate of one (1) duplicate/replicate sample per 20 samples or per batch <br /> shipment to the laboratory, whichever is more often. Duplicate samples are collected <br /> simultaneously and replicate samples are collected sequentially. Duplicate samples are collected at <br /> the same time as the primary sample using a "tee" fitting and two separate SummaTM canisters, each <br /> with pre-set flow control regulators. Replicate samples are collected immediately after the primary <br /> sample using a second SummaTM canister. For the proposed sampling plan, a minimum of one soil <br /> gas sample duplicate/replicate will be collected. In addition to duplicate/replicate samples, field QC <br /> samples will also include equipment blanks (called a soil vapor well material blank in the ASGI <br /> guidance) and field blanks (called a method blank in the ASGI guidance). The equipment blank will <br /> TERRA PACIFIC GROUP Page 17 April 4, 2012 <br />