Laserfiche WebLink
1 . <br /> An important concern associated with the environmental assessment of agricultural properties is <br /> the issue of buried pesticide containers. It was an occasional practice to dispose of containers by <br /> this method many years ago. To detect these types of underground artifacts is difficult even with <br /> the use of ground penetrating radar or other types of non-intrusive, subsurface analyses. The land <br /> surface did not exhibit visual indicators for buried containers such as surfacing of product residue, <br /> soil mounding or soil depressions. In addition, it would be very difficult to bury objects due to <br /> the severe hardpan. <br /> The static groundwater is found approximately 110 feet under the property as illustrated on the <br /> attached depth to groundwater map. This is considered a deep groundwater elevation. Deep <br /> groundwater cannot be easily impacted from pesticides or nitrogen in the form of nitrates. This is <br /> particularly true when there are intervening layers of clay soil down to the static water table <br /> depth. During our drilling procedures for percolation testing, it was found that the soil profile to <br /> a depth of 25 feet consists of a heavy clay soil with some gravel and sandy clay strata. The <br /> groundwater directional flow appears to be towards the northeast. <br /> Since the subject property has not been in agricultural production for several years, an evaluation <br /> of agrichemical residues as a nonpoint source of potential contamination was not performed. The <br /> science of pesticide residues in soil, air, surface water and groundwater is extremely complex and <br /> variable. Environmental models which attempt to predict pesticide behavior and transport in the <br /> environment are beyond the scope of this investigation. It has been clearly evident over the last <br /> four decades that the risk/benefit ratio regarding pesticides has been overwhelming benefit and <br /> comparatively low risk to the United States population and to the environment, as a whole. <br /> Environmental fate data is presented for the following pesticides which may have been applied <br /> either to the subject parcel many years ago or to surrounding acreage. These are a few of the <br /> more commonly used pesticides, although there are many others. This list illustrates <br /> environmental fate data, indicating the half-lives are comparatively fast. Data was obtained from <br /> the Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic <br /> Pesticide Chemicals: <br /> Dual. Common name: Metachlor. Half-lives in the environment: Groundwater: <br /> degradation time 500-1000 days (d). Soil: Half-lives in clay loam are 15-38 d. <br /> Phytolysis: Under optimum exposure conditions to natural sunlight, half life is <br /> approx. 8 d. <br /> Sevin. Common name: Carbaryl. Half-lives in the environment: Air: 12.6 hrs. Surface <br /> water: 3.2-200 hrs. Groundwater: 3.2-1440 hrs. Soil: 97-251 hrs in dry soil, 4458- <br /> 4688 hrs in saturated soil. <br /> Dimethoate. Half-lives in the environment: Air: 0.469-4.69 hrs. Surface water: 264-1344 hrs. <br /> Groundwater: 528-2688 hrs. Soil: 264-888 hrs. <br /> Orthene. Common name: Acephate. Half-lives in the environment: Soil: selected field half- <br /> life of 3.0 d. Hydrolysis: half-life of 60 hrs <br /> 4 <br /> vye• 6mliht C-trol Inspection <br />