Laserfiche WebLink
0 -_ 0 <br /> There is a storage shed near the SWC of the subject site (Lot 16), directly north of Harney Lane. <br /> This shed was inspected for hazardous materials and/or agrichemical storage. No hazardous <br /> materials were observed,. The only agrichemical storage consisted of several pallets and empty, <br /> bags of sulfur dust which is used for mildew control on the grapes. <br /> An important concern associated with the environmental assessment of agricultural properties is <br /> the issue of buried pesticide containers. It was an occasional practice to dispose of containers by <br /> this method many years ago. To detect these types of underground artifacts is difficult even with <br /> the use of ground penetrating radar or other types of non-intrusive, subsurface analyses. The <br /> land surface did not exhibit visual indicators for buried containers such as surfacing of product <br /> residue, soil mounding or soil depressions. In addition, it is highly unlikely containers would <br /> have been buried on-site due to the past history of the property and the fact that there is a <br /> likelihood of severe hardpan under the soil surface. <br /> The static groundwater is found approximately 130 feet under the property as illustrated on the <br /> attached depth to groundwater map. This is considered a deep groundwater elevation. Deep <br /> groundwater cannot be easily impacted from pesticides or nitrogen in the form of nitrates. This <br /> is particularly true when there is intervening layers of clay soil down to the static water table <br /> depth. Well logs were reviewed at the Environmental Health Department to ascertain underlying <br /> soil strata types. Although the closest well log was over one mile to the north, the soil strata <br /> consists predominately of clay strata. <br /> The groundwater directional flow appears to be slightly towards the northeast, to an area of <br /> recharge. <br /> Found in the Appendix is an Application Material Report listing all pesticides applied to the <br /> subject property for the crop year 1997 and 1998. Since the subject property has been in <br /> viticulture production for only a couple of years, an evaluation of agrichemical residues as a <br /> nonpoint source of potential contamination was not performed. The science of pesticide residues <br /> in soil, air, surface water and groundwater is extremely complex and variable. Environmental <br /> models which attempt to predict pesticide behavior and transport in the environment are beyond <br /> the scope of this investigation. It has been clearly evident over the last five decades that the <br /> risk/benefit ratio regarding pesticides has been overwhelming benefit and comparatively low risk <br /> to the United States population and the environment, as a whole. <br /> The following is environmental fate data of the herbicides (except sulfur)which were applied to <br /> the subject property, as documented. This list illustrates environmental fate data, indicating the <br /> half-lives are comparatively fast. Data, if available,was obtained from the Illustrated Handbook <br /> of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Pesticide Chemicals: <br /> 3 <br /> vaffey Ag Pfsearch <br />