My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004063 SSC RPT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FINE
>
950
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-99-24
>
SU0004063 SSC RPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2019 11:22:41 AM
Creation date
11/25/2019 11:03:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSC RPT
RECORD_ID
SU0004063
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-99-24
STREET_NUMBER
950
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
FINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
ENTERED_DATE
5/11/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
950 N FINE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
3/13/2000 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k' ■ K L E I N F E L D E R <br /> 7 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Kleinfelder performed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in accordance with the scope <br /> and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-97. The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate <br /> recognizable environmental conditions associated with the present or past usage, storage, or <br /> disposal of hazardous substances or petroleum hydrocarbons at the subject site. The findings of <br /> this environmental assessment are presented below, and are based on Kleinfelder's knowledge of <br /> the subject site from our site observations and information gathered during our review. These <br /> findings are subject to the limitations presented at the end of this report, and may change if <br /> additional information becomes available. <br /> 7.1. BACKGROUND <br /> Based upon our review of aerial photographs, the site was historically been used as a rural <br /> residential area and a vacant (field. The known agricultural use of the site has been open range. <br /> dry crop grain and hay productloll. <br /> 7.2. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> !' Based upon the results of our research. Kleinfelder makes the following observations regarding <br /> ! the site. <br /> 1) Environmentally persistent pesticides are generally not applied to rangeland and dry crop <br /> grain. No obvious evidence of auricultural chemical mixing areas or dumping were noted in <br /> the aerial photographs reviewed or during the site reconnaissance. Normal agricultural <br /> chemical use for crop production generally does not trigger enforcement actions or <br /> assessment requirements by environmental regulatory agencies. If further evaluation of this <br /> issue is desired. soil sampling and analysis could be conducted. <br /> 2) On properties with a history 'oi' agricultural use, many underground pipelines may exist. It <br /> was common for said pipelines to contain asbestos (e.g. Transite pipe). Subsurface <br /> exploration is not a part ol'a typical Phase I Environmental Site Assessment scope of work. <br /> In the event that any subsurface structures are encountered during site development or <br /> excavation on site, care should he exercised in determining whether or not the subsurface <br /> structures contain asbestos. If' they contain asbestos, they should be removed, handled, <br /> transported, and disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal laws and regulations. <br /> Additionally. iii suspect materials are encountered, the signatories of this report should be <br /> notified. <br /> 20-4354-01.1101/2017It76I 1'aec 17 of20 <br /> Copyright 1999 Kleinfelder. Inc. September 7, 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.