My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
913
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545099
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2019 3:53:10 PM
Creation date
12/17/2019 3:40:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545099
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0025655
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY SHOWCASE CO
STREET_NUMBER
913
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
13545022
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
913 W FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
\./ *.WWI <br /> 913 Fremont <br /> Page 2 <br /> had dropped to 1,800 ppb TPH-g, 50 ppb Benzene, 220 ppb Xylenes by September <br /> 1994, and 1,420 ppb of TPH-g, 119 ppb of Benzene, 113ppb of Xylenes by December <br /> 1994. However, this drop occurred months before the excavation of 125 cubic yards of <br /> contaminated soil on December 19, 1994 from the former underground storage tank <br /> (UST) area. The excavation was backfilled with clean soil and the contaminated soil <br /> was transported to Forward, Inc. for disposal. The soil removal appears to have had <br /> little affect on the level of contaminant concentration in MW-2 groundwater. In the <br /> four years since the over-excavation, analytical results of MW-2 groundwater ranged <br /> from 1183 ppb (7/95) to 4010 ppb (12/97) of TPH-g, 61 ppb (7/98) to 345 ppb (3/95) <br /> of Benzene, and 188 ppb (7/95) to 1040 ppb (12/97) of Xylenes. There does not appear <br /> to be a reduction trend in any of the contaminants with respect to time. Even with the <br /> screen interval below first water, the level of Benzene concentration in MW-2 is above <br /> the California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for public drinking water of 1 <br /> ppb Benzene. <br /> Analytical results of the soil sample taken from the bottom of the over-excavation at 16 <br /> feet 6 inches bsg on December 20, 1994 were 1000 parts per million (ppm) TPH-g, 1.5 <br /> ppm Benzene, and 39 ppm Xylenes. However, analytical results of soil samples taken <br /> at 20 feet bsg and at 25.5 feet bsg during the construction of MW-2 in April 1994 were <br /> non-detect with detection limits of 1 ppm TPH-g, and 0.003 ppm BTEX. 8 soil probe <br /> borings were advanced on November 27, 1995 and November 28, 1995, and 3 <br /> additional soil probe borings were advanced on January 4, 1996. The deepest of these <br /> soil samples was collected at 13 feet bsg. Analytical results of soil samples from 3 soil <br /> probe borings designated A-4, B-3, and C-2 toward the direction of MW-4, had <br /> contaminant concentrations of 57 ppm TPH-g, 0.116 ppm Benzene, and 3.537 Xylenes <br /> in A-4; 2.0 ppm TPH-g, and 0.016 ppm Benzene in B-3; and 2.0 ppm TPH-g in C-2. <br /> Analytical results of soil samples collected at 5 feet bsg, 10.5 feet bsg, and 17 feet bsg <br /> during the construction of MW-4 were non-detect with detection limits of 0.05 ppm <br /> TPH-g, and 0.003 ppm BTEX. The Eighth Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reports <br /> Details of Placement of Monitoring Well!#4 dated July 30, 1996 prepared by William <br /> Hunter concluded: "As indicated on PLATE IV, the limits of soil & water <br /> contamination have been fully defined in all directions." According to analytical data <br /> and plates contained in reports prepared by William Hunter, the vertical extent of the <br /> soil contamination appears to be limited to approximately 17 feet bsg, while the lateral <br /> extent of the contamination in the soil is most likely to be limited to approximately 40 <br /> feet northeast of MW-2. <br /> ORC placement was first suggested as a remediation alternative in Fourth Quarter 1997 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report dated January 26, 1998 prepared by William Hunter. <br /> Mr. Hunter again recommended ORC placement as a relatively inexpensive method of <br /> reducing groundwater contamination to acceptable level in Second Quarter 1998 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report dated August 14, 1998. PHS/EHD agreed that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.