Laserfiche WebLink
,Nbv'=1'/,-05 07 : 50A P .UZ <br /> Attention Karla Kuhl <br /> Regarding application number PIS-05000764(MS), the property <br /> located west of the Windwood subdivision, as a rule, my wife and I <br /> have no objections. However, we have a sewer problem in <br /> Woodbridge which will only be exacerbated by an additional <br /> development. Until the situation is resolved as to how additional <br /> sewer capacity is to be addressed, there is little point in adding <br /> more development to the area. There are already several properties <br /> being built on in Woodbridge proper, and several others that will <br /> eventually be built on, and these will take precedence for sewer <br /> hook up. <br /> We have been fortunate that our sewer system has held up without <br /> dumping raw sewage into the river again. However it is only a <br /> matter of time until this problem arises. The capacity is not there <br /> and a Final solution has not been presented to even solve our <br /> present capacity situation. <br /> The project description as a "minor subdivision" fails to take into <br /> account the size of Woodbridge and the sewer situation. With the <br /> restrictions that we have, this "minor development" is a major <br /> problem for incorporation into Woodbridge and should be rejected. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Brad and Lynette Dickey <br /> 19646 Meadow View Dr, <br /> Woodbridge, Ca. 95258 <br />