My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2941
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518632
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 2:52:57 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 2:27:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518632
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014022
FACILITY_NAME
ST SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
2941
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2941 NAVY DR
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Joe Aldridge - 3 - 22 April 2009 <br /> NuStar Terminals Stockton Facility <br /> f <br /> • The source of TPHg, benzene, and MTBE detected in boring NIS-14 and NS-21 is on the <br /> KMEP facility. <br /> NuStar recommends installing B and C zone wells collocated with four borings downgradient <br /> of the Site and obtaining D-zone grab groundwater samples from three of the locations. The <br /> grab groundwater samples will be prepared for laboratory analysis using a glass filter and <br /> silica gel cleanup to remove non petroleum organics that may have been the cause of <br /> elevated TPHd concentrations in grab groundwater samples obtained from the borings. <br /> Our comments are presented below. <br /> 1. After two mobilizations and a proposed third, the vertical extent of pollution at this Site still <br /> has not been delineated. The collection of D-zone grab groundwater samples at the <br /> previous locations of NS-18, NS-15, and NS-21, and south of PS/MW-17 will not <br /> accomplish vertical delineation since NuStar is proposing to sample no deeper than the <br /> depths from which samples have already been collected from these borings. As stated in <br /> our 12 June 2008 letter, delineation means identifying the point of non-detect (ND) and <br /> would have been most efficiently achieved using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <br /> (EPA's) triad method. This method allows for immediate assessment of laboratory <br /> analytical results and advancement of deeper borings, if necessary. <br /> 2. We do not concur that another monitoring well is needed upgradient from PS/MW-17. <br /> Groundwater COC concentrations in PS/MW-17 are mostly below method detection limits. <br /> A D-zone or deeper well, however, is needed at boring NS-11 where elevated <br /> concentrations of TPH have been identified in the C-zone and likely extend to the D-zone. <br /> 3. The Investigation Report offers conclusions which appear to contradict or be unsupported <br /> by the earlier statements in the text. Page 14 states that there are no clear pathways to the <br /> D-zone from the MacSteel aboveground storage tank, but Page 15 attributes <br /> contamination observed in D-zone boring NS-21 to a source at the MacSteel facility. Page <br /> 14 attributes the elevated concentrations of TPHd in NS-21 to steep vertical migration from <br /> monitoring well SP/M-9 on the KMEP site, which is located just upgradient from NuStar. On <br /> Page 15, however, NuStar states that a pathway does not exist from the KMEP facility to <br /> NS-21, although cross-section B-B' identifies laterally continuous gravel and a water- <br /> bearing unit that extend from upgradient of KMEP directly to NS-21. A deeper laterally <br /> continuous sand unit is truncated from the western end of the cross-section where it is <br /> extrapolated to exist in other cross sections. <br /> NuStar explains that the variable thicknesses and depths observed in units that were <br /> previously thought to be laterally continuous show a lack of continuity. Page 12 states that <br /> the reclassified D-zone is a less significant pathway consisting of thinner and less <br /> continuous sand layers. While it is obvious that the flood plain sediments that underlie the <br /> Site vicinity are not arranged in a "layer cake" formation, the data do not show that this <br /> configuration makes them any less conductive than previously thought. The steep vertical <br /> migration from the A/B to the C- and D-zones described by NuStar communicates that <br /> pollution migrated through multiple fine-grained units to travel from the shallow source to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.