Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> AMB IA <br /> INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES <br /> Cambria performed interim remedial activities at the site during March 2004, which consisted of <br /> groundwater extraction from two onsite groundwater monitoring wells The primary objective of <br /> interim groundwater extraction was to remove 1,2-DCA mass from the groundwater and the <br /> secondary objective was to assess the aquifer's hydraulic properties <br /> Personnel Present. Cambria field technician Dayton Busch conducted the field activities, <br /> working under Senior Project Engineer Dan Lescure's supervision <br /> Well S-1-85 Step Discharge Test On March 30 and 31, 2004, Cambria conducted a step <br /> discharge test on well S-1-85 Groundwater was extracted using a 2-inch diameter Grundfos <br /> electric submersible pump The extracted groundwater was temporarily stored in an on-site <br /> storage tank, and later transported via vacuum truck to the Shell refinery in Martinez, California <br /> for recycling <br /> The following parameters were monitored during each step duration, flow rate, extracted <br /> • groundwater volume, and drawdown A totalizing flow meter was used to monitor the flow rate <br /> and number of gallons pumped during the tests Pressure head measurements were collected <br /> from well S-1-85, S-3-84, and S4-83 using MmiTrollTM pressure transducers Water levels were <br /> also checked manually with an electronic water level indicator from these and other wells <br /> Samples were collected periodically from the extracted groundwater stream during the test and <br /> retained in vials containing hydrochloric acid preservative with no head space These samples <br /> were labeled, entered onto a chain-of-custody record, and placed into a cooler with ice for <br /> transport to a state of California certified laboratory for analyses The samples were analyzed for <br /> TPHg,BTEX,MTBE,and 1,2-DCA by EPA Method 8260B <br /> S-1-85 Step Discharge Test Results On March 30, 2004 the first step was performed at an <br /> extraction rate of approximately 0 5 gallons per minute (gpm) Initially, the pump was set <br /> approximately 1 foot above the bottom of the well However, sands and silts within the well <br /> inhibited pump operation The pump was reset (raised) to approximately 73 5 fbg to alleviate <br /> this problem The initial pumping rate (0 5 gpm) was maintained for 99 minutes until the water <br /> table stabilized at 0 460 feet of drawdown A second step was performed at an extraction rate of <br /> approximately 10 gpm This pumping rate was maintained for 96 minutes until the water table <br /> stabilized at 0 976 feet of drawdown A third step was performed at an extraction rate of <br /> approximately 2 0 gpm This pumping rate was maintained for 62 minutes until the water table <br /> 0797 6 <br />