Laserfiche WebLink
the field (e.g., tightening fittings) and the test was repeated. If the <10% criteria cannot <br /> be achieved, that location and depth was eliminated from the validation program. <br /> Additional QAIQC for Soil Gas Sampling <br /> An additional QA/QC step was employed during sampling activities associated with the use of <br /> the Summa canisters to avoid the collection of invalid data. This step included checking the <br /> vacuum pressure of each canister to verify an initial vacuum of at least minus 28 inches of <br /> mercury. If a canister had a vacuum less than minus 28 inches of mercury, the canister was not <br /> used as this is indicative of a leak that may have developed during shipment or handling of the <br /> canisters. <br /> 3.2.4 Well Installation and Groundwater Sampling Procedures <br /> The scope of work for soil sampling and well installation was conducted by, or under the <br /> supervision of, a California Professional Geologist. All installation and subsequent sampling <br /> procedures followed DTSC guidance manuals, specifically, "Monitoring Well Design and <br /> Construction for Hydrogeologic Characterization," (DTSC, 1995) and "Representative Sampling <br /> of Groundwater for Hazardous Substances" (DTSC, 2006). <br /> Prior to beginning any fieldwork, appropriate well construction permits (Appendix G) were <br /> obtained and Underground Services Alert was notified. The SJCDEH requires: 1) a permit for <br /> the installation of any groundwater monitoring wells; and 2) that the wells be installed by a <br /> driller who has the C57 Well Driller's License. <br /> 3.2.4.1 Well Installation and Development Procedures <br /> The technical work scope for this Report included the drilling, sampling, installation of one <br /> groundwater monitoring well (TW-5) and development of five groundwater monitoring wells <br /> (TW-1 through TW-5) for inclusion into the monitoring well network at the Site (Figure 9). <br /> These wells were used to determine the potential impacts in groundwater from previous Site <br /> operations and/or the potential impacts from off-site sources. In addition, monitoring wells TW-1 <br /> and TW-2 were video logged to determine if sediment in these wells was due to the well being <br /> damaged or if it was due to ongoing natural infiltration of fines into the wells. <br /> The following provides information regarding the installation and development of the monitoring <br /> wells at the Site: <br /> • Borehole A3-2 Stratigraphy — The stratigraphy of one borehole (A3-2) was drilled and <br /> logged for the purpose of. (1) assessing for possible perched groundwater; (2) identifying <br /> the top of groundwater table; and (3) converting Boring A3-2 into Monitoring Well TW- <br /> 5. The borehole was advanced to a depth of 26 feet bgs. The augers were advanced at <br /> intervals of 5 feet and continuous core subsurface soil samples were collected using an <br /> 18-inch California modified split spoon sampler lined with brass sleeves. Boring logs are <br /> provided in Appendix E. <br /> • Borehole A3-2 Sample Collection - Soil samples were collected from Boring A3-2 at <br /> one, three, five, and 10 feet bgs. Thereafter, samples were collected for analysis at 5 foot <br /> intervals. As outlined in the April 2008 Workplan (Parsons, 2008), soil samples were <br /> analyzed for PAHs using EPA Method 8310; TPH as gasoline, diesel and motor oil using <br /> PARSONS 24 FINAL RI REPORT-FORMER TRACY MGP <br /> APRIL 2010 <br />