Laserfiche WebLink
groundwater flow, changes in residual hydrocarbon composition, the chemical characteristics <br /> of impact, and adsorption absorption factors will control the pace and degree of cleanup <br /> Because of transport limitations and additional air spargmg, the short-term advantage of <br /> Alternative 1 would not significantly change the remediation lifespan relative to that expected <br /> for Alternative 2 Using technical, environmental safety, and economic criteria it was shown <br /> that implementation of Alternative 1 would not be cost-effective <br /> Alternative 2 was favored because it is known to be effective, the costs to public health and <br /> safety are less than those associated with Alternative 1, and the resource cost to the public is <br /> more reasonable than that for Alternative 1 It was shown that Alternative 2 minimizes the <br /> potential burden on the people of the State with the expense of remediation <br /> 3201337B/CAP—AMD DOC 21 November 30, 1995 <br />