Laserfiche WebLink
On July 9, 1992, Resna published their Summary Report—Assessment of Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbon Contamination of the Groundwater Their scope of work included the installation <br /> and sampling of two additional groundwater monitoring wells (MW-2 and MW-3) The highest <br /> concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons in groundwater(1,100 µg11 of Total Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons [TPH)-as-gasoline and 120 µg11 of benzene) were detected in MW-3, <br /> approximately 30 feet north and downgradient of the former USTs <br /> From May 8, 1992 to April 27, 1994, the three monitoring wells were monitored and sampled on <br /> three different occasions In general, the concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons in these wells <br /> declined, However, by April 27, 1994, the static groundwater level had risen above the top of the <br /> screen interval in all three wells This condition does not promote accurate monitoring of <br /> groundwater table characteristics <br /> On July 8, 1994, Resna published Summary Report/Additional Groundwater Investigation This <br /> report documented the installation of two additional groundwater monitoring wells (MW-4 and <br /> MW-5) Gasoline hydrocarbons were not detected in groundwater collected from these two new <br /> wells The direction of groundwater flow continued to the north-northeast <br /> On June 29, 1995, Groundwater Technology, Inc (GTI) published their Environmental <br /> Assessment Report documenting the installation of two vapor extraction well nests (VW-1 and <br /> VW-2) and two single vapor extraction wells (VW-3 and VW-4) and the pilot testing and <br /> modeling of soil vapor extraction Results of this work indicated that an area of approximately <br /> 2,055 square feet of soil is impacted by gasoline hydrocarbons to a depth of approximately 70 <br /> feet bgs Soil vapor extraction testing indicated an achievable radius of influence of 59 to 75 <br /> ffeet and an effective coverage of 80 percent of the impacted soil plume Based on these <br /> findings GTI recommended that the site be remediated by soil vapor extraction plus air sparging <br /> from MW-1 This active remedial work was never implemented <br /> By January 1996, the continued dramatic rise in the groundwater table elevation had exceeded <br /> the top of the screen interval in all five groundwater monitoring wells and had entered the screen <br /> interval of the two deeper soil vapor extraction wells (VW-1 and VW-2) Coincidentally, from July <br /> 1995 to April 1996, groundwater samples collected on four quarterly occasions from the five <br /> monitoring wells did not contain detectable concentrations of TPH-as-gasoline <br /> ' In August 1996, sampling of the five original monitoring wells was discontinued and the sampling <br /> of the two deeper vapor extraction wells (VW-1 and VW-2) was initiated Groundwater samples <br /> collected from VW-1 and VW-2 contained detectable concentrations of TPH-as-gasoline (up to <br /> . 12,000 µg11), benzene (up to 1,300 µg/l) and Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) (up to 1,800 µg11) <br /> 3 <br />