My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009051
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 2:26:35 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 10:37:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
RECORD_ID
PR0009051
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0000649
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER NESTLE USA INC FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
230
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
25938001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
230 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amec— <br /> Other <br /> important O&M assumptions include: <br /> o Each recirculation well pair is assumed to operate for 6 hours per week. <br /> Recirculation will occur in one direction for three hours and then in the opposite <br /> direction for the remaining three hours. <br /> o Annual system operating time is assumed to be 8,400 hours per year for 30 <br /> years. <br /> o The performance monitoring system will comprise 90 multi-level wells spaced at <br /> 100-feet centers along two transects, with 45 wells in the upgradient monitoring <br /> well transect, and 45 wells in the downgradient monitoring well transect. <br /> The total cost of in situ treatment with a bio-curtain greatly outweighs the costs for wellhead <br /> treatment and water replacement (the current strategy). Furthermore, as discussed in Section <br /> 3.2, the bio-curtain system may not be effective at completely treating and containing VOC- <br /> affected groundwater in the vicinity of the WWTP. Therefore, bioaugmentation is not <br /> considered to be an effective alternative for treating groundwater beneath the WWTP area. <br /> 3.5 ENERGY REQUIREMENTS <br /> The amount of power required to pump water for recirculation and control the metering pumps <br /> is estimated to be 846 mega-watt hours (MWh) per year of operation (Table B.2-1). This is <br /> much lower than the energy requirements of the biosparging system described in Technical <br /> Attachment#1 and is not a major consideration for implementing a bioaugmentation <br /> biocurtain. <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on analysis of effectiveness, implementability and cost of biosparging (presented <br /> below) it is concluded that bioaugmentation is not feasible for treating COC-affected <br /> groundwater near the City of Ripon WWTP Lagoons. <br /> The effectiveness analysis concluded that: <br /> • In theory, bioaugmentation could be effective at destroying VOC mass in situ; however; <br /> in practice, adequate distribution of the microbes across the bio-curtain alignment is <br /> highly uncertain, therefore the effectiveness of bioaugmentation is highly unlikely. <br /> The implementability analysis concluded that: <br /> • The final as-built system would be an almost mile long fenced compound adjacent to <br /> the Stanislaus River. There are significant implementation challenges associated with <br /> public acceptance of an almost mile long fenced remediation compound adjacent to <br /> the Stanislaus River. <br /> AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. <br /> \\oad-fs1\doc_safe\9000s\9837.006\4000 REGULATORYTFS Assessment_Apx B_01 2711\Attachment B.2\Attach B-2.doc 132-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.