Laserfiche WebLink
S E C O R <br /> 2003 Feasibility Study Report and Site Assessment Work Plan <br /> July 18, 2003 <br /> Page 17 <br /> continue around the northern-most property corner (near well MW-50B) and end along the northeast <br /> property line (near well MW-51 A). <br /> Pumping wells would be approximately 30 feet deep and placed every 50 feet on center for a total of <br /> twenty wells. Submersible pumps with level controls would be installed in the wells to maximize <br /> continuous groundwater drawdown. Extracted groundwater would be treated on-site via a carbon <br /> treatment system designed to handle approximately 180 gallons per minute. Recovered <br /> groundwater would initially enter a forwarding tank to capture sediments and allow batch treatment. <br /> During batch treatment, electric forwarding pumps would transfer groundwater through a series of <br /> bag filters (to remove finer sediments) and through a series of granular activated carbon canisters for <br /> final treatment. Treated groundwater would then be discharged to the storm drain or sanitary sewer <br /> under an appropriate permit. A process flow diagram of the hydraulic control line is presented as <br /> Figure 8. <br /> Semi-annual off-site groundwater sampling would be conducted to evaluate compliance with the <br /> Basin Plan's WQOs. <br /> 6.3 Combination Groundwater Barrier and Hydraulic Control Line <br /> This alternative consists of a subsurface low-permeable wall and a series of pumping wells used to <br /> function as a hydraulic control line (Figure 2). The groundwater barrier in this alternative would act <br /> as a groundwater deflector to direct groundwater to a location where pumping wells are placed. The <br /> pumping wells would then extract groundwater and deter or prevent the migration of hydrocarbons <br /> beyond the property line. <br /> The barrier wall would be approximately 800 feet long, 30 feet deep and 12 inches wide. The barrier <br /> wall would extend from the northwest property line (near well MW-47A), continue around the <br /> northem-most property corner (near well MW-50B) and end along the northeast property line (near <br /> well MW-19A). <br /> Installation of the barrier wall could be accomplished as described in Section 6.1. The hydraulic <br /> control line would be approximately 200 feet long and extend along the northeast property line from <br /> well MW-19A to well MW-51A. Pumping wells would be approximately 30 feet deep and placed <br /> every 50 feet on center for a total of four wells. Submersible pumps and level controls would be <br /> installed in the wells as described in Section 6.2 and extracted groundwater would be treated on-site <br /> via a carbon treatment system designed to handle approximately 36 gallons per minute. Recovered <br /> groundwater would initially enter a forwarding tank to capture sediments and allow batch treatment. <br /> During batch treatment, electric forwarding pumps would transfer groundwater through a series of <br /> bag filters (to remove finer sediments) and through a series of granular activated carbon canisters for <br /> final treatment. Treated groundwater would then be discharged to the storm drain or sanitary sewer <br /> under the appropriate permit. A process flow diagram of the groundwater barrier and the hydraulic <br /> control line is presented as Figure 9. <br /> Semi-annual off-site groundwater sampling would be conducted to evaluate compliance with the <br /> Basin Plan's WQOs. <br /> 6.4 Groundwater Oxygenation System <br /> This alternative consists of installing groundwater oxygenation points in series to create and oxygen- <br /> enriched zone along the terminal property line (Figure 2). These groundwater oxygenation points <br /> would be used to increase dissolved-oxygen concentrations in the saturated zone and enhance the <br /> I:\Chevron\1001621\REPORTS\2003\2003FS\FS 2003 revD.doc <br />