Laserfiche WebLink
p, li i <br /> 305 Hutchins, Lode i# page 2 <br /> Mike Harper s <br /> active gas station(Bokides),did_detect Benzene for this date at 17 ug/r. Additionally, MTBE was <br /> detected in MW-5 for the sa 4 e date at 300 ug/l as well as DCA, DCE,TGE,and PCE. <br /> It has been the contention ofe consulting firm for the FDIC that constituentsof concern detected in <br /> Togo's wells have been directly relates!to the Bokides site. MTBE, Benzene, and DCA <br /> concentration levels have shown correlated patterns when the groundwater analyses have been <br /> evaluated. .1 <br /> MTBE iso-concentration maps�s have shown;an increasing concentration pattern as the groundwater <br /> flows southerly onto and through the Togo's site. With this in mind, PHS=EHD planed the Bokides <br /> site into the SWRCB Local Oversight Program(LOP) for investigation of their suspected <br /> unauthorized release from the UGTs located on their site; l <br /> Y I� <br /> PHS-EHD concluded in corres ondence,lanua 9, <br /> p ry 1996 that the soil still in place ori'the Togo`s site. <br /> at 25 feet below ground surface(` bgs):contained TPH-G concentrations as High as 6700 mg/kg in <br /> one area and 5000 mg/kg in another area and may be contributing to the groundwater degradation. <br /> Since a previous vapor extraction effort from VW-1 has proven to;be effective at reducing 11,000 <br /> mg/kg ofTPH-G soil contamination at boring "EB11-25"to non dEtect,'PHS-EHD required additional <br /> vappr extraction wells and a:soil vapor extraction test to be conducted at the other areas of concern. <br /> A vapor extraction test conducted on the newly installed vapor wells also indicated positive results. <br /> it <br /> PHS-EHD was preparing to approve this remedial activity when the LawrenceLivermore Study was <br /> released and the SWRCB recommended LOP agencies re-evaluate sites based on a"tow. dsk7 <br /> ;criteria. Based on a receptortsurvey, the levels of constituents of,,concern at the time;the real <br /> possibility that an up-gradieri source existed, and that no significant Benzene contamination was <br /> noted in the soil still ori-site, PHS-EHD concluded that vapor extraction.may not be the.:. ostcost- <br /> effective method when compared to natural attenuation over time` <br /> CVRWQCB recommendations include soil sampling for 1,2 DCA;-as well as TPH G`;.TIH-D,TPH <br /> MO, BTEX, and MTBE in"soils above the 1979 water level". Additional recommendations from the <br /> CVRWQCB includelf nq 12DCA is detected in soil samples above the 1979 water level,we <br /> cu <br /> (CVRWQCB)will conrvvith;isite closure....". This statement confirms that the CVRV1 00,does not <br /> consider that the primary constituents of gasoline require further investigation and remediation. The <br /> only constituent the CVRW. .QCB is concerned with is 1,2 DCA. The TRC discussers the existence <br /> and levels of 1,2 DCA in the groundwater extensively and concluded that 1,2 DCA is associated <br /> with the degradatlor� of PGE arid.TCE as well as a past additive used in;gasoline: <br /> Even;tf 1,20 CA is found in the soil at this site, the source of the 1',2 DCA in the groundwater maybe <br /> from the breakdown of the P..E and:TCE In addition,the only drinking water wells within 200616 <br /> et <br /> 9 ... <br /> of this site are up-gradient and it is not anticipated that they will be impacted by a release from this <br /> site. Remediation of the 1,2 IBCA in the groundwater does not appear to be cost-effective since the <br /> levels:in the groundwater at this time are inconsistent. li <br /> e <br />