Laserfiche WebLink
4 . On-site chromatograph, capable of determining micrograms <br /> per liter Total Fuel Hydrocarbons . Photovac 1OS50 for <br /> field screening. <br /> 5 . Manometers, both mercury and water type for taking vacuum <br /> readings of the wells and the recovery system. <br /> Methods and Procedures : <br /> The pilot test was performed by attaching a dual orifice manifold <br /> to the well casing. A vapor extraction pump (Rotron DR404, <br /> Regenerative Blower) was then connected to the orifice manifold <br /> pulling the vapor from the well and pumping it into an ' activated <br /> carbon canister' to control emissions . A one day, vapor source <br /> test was conducted on March 14 , 1995 . Individual wells MW4 , S1, <br /> S2 and MW8 were vented to carbon scrub canisters; MW4 was <br /> subjected to a one hour and 10 minute test, S1 was vented for 50 <br /> minutes, S2 was vented for one hour and MW8 was subjected to the <br /> longest test of 5 hours . Vacuum influence readings were taken on <br /> all wells during various times throughout the testing of the <br /> individual wells, see Table 2 . <br /> The vapor stream was repeatedly sampled and tested during the <br /> pilot test by an ambient air Photoionization Detector (PID) Gas <br /> Chromatograph (Photovac 1OS50) . Flow rates and vacuum readings <br /> were taken concurrently with the vapor stream samples (see Table <br /> 2­ ard_'"2)7� -The onsite portable chromatograph'- was used to <br /> calculate 'poundage removed' and to show any significant changes <br /> in the vapor concentration, in regards to time and flow rates, <br /> see Table 1 . Selected Tedlar bag samples were obtained during <br /> the test and submitted to WEGE ' non-certified' laboratory and <br /> analyzed with a GC/FID for C1 through C10 compounds . These vapor <br /> samples were also chain of custody delivered to a California <br /> State Certified Laboratory (American Environmental Network (AEN) , <br /> DHS##1172) and each analyzed for TFH, BTEX. CO2 and 02 were <br /> determined in the field using drager tubes/pump and Gastech <br /> LEL/02 meter, see Table 1 . <br /> The on--site portable chromatograph was used to calculate the <br /> concentrations of the vapor stream and also to determine efficacy <br /> and emmision control of the vapor extraction system. Flow rates <br /> in cubic feet per minute were determined at the site using a one <br /> inch orifice plate, the orifice plate was placed in line from the <br /> well, this restriction causes a pressure drop across the orifice . <br /> The pressure drop across the orifice is used to calculate the air <br /> flow rate . Pounds per day and/or hour recovered can be <br /> determined from this flow rate and the vapor stream concentration <br /> obtained from the sample collected during the flow rate <br /> measurement, in mg/L (see Table 1) . <br /> 2 USA55 Vapor Ext . Results <br />