Laserfiche WebLink
' 17 February 2004 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 96-0254 <br /> ' Page 5 of 10 <br /> from wells MW-7 and MW-8 MTBE was detected in the ground water sample collected from MW-7 <br /> at a concentration of 84 gg/l MTBE was not detected in the sample collected from well MW-8 <br /> Monitoring well logs,soil boring logs and construction specifications are presented in Appendix A <br /> Quarterly ground water monitoring has been ongoing at the site since January 2000 TPH-g and <br /> TPH-d have only been detected In wells MW-1 and MW-2, their have been no other detections of <br /> TPH-g and TPH-d in any of the other ground water samples collected 44fttslnce sampling began <br /> Additionally,BTEX compounds have not been detected above laboratory reporting limits in any of <br /> the ground water samples collected from the site since sampling began,with the exception of xylene, <br /> detected In well MW-1 at a concentration of 8 2 ug/1 in August 2000 MTBE has been detected <br /> Intermittently in samples collected from wells MW-3,MW-4,MW-5 and MW-7 at concentrations <br /> ranging from,0 51 gg/l to A Vg/l, MTBE has not been detected above laboratory reporting limits <br />' in any of the ground water samples collected from wells MW-6 and MW-8 since sampling began <br /> vm.7l�lU�f <br /> MTBE has been detected each quarter I the samples collected from wells MW-1 and MW-2 at <br /> concentrations ranging fromgg/l to ;9 µg/l However the average concentration of MTBE <br /> each quarter in the water samples collected from wells MW-1 and MW-2 is approximately 1,300 gg/l 3 <br /> A graph of MTBE concentrations in wells MW-I and MW-2 since sampling began is presented in <br />' Appendix B Analytical results of ground water samples are summarized in Tables 4 and 5 - <br /> Cross-sections depicting the general lithology in the soil beneath the site is illustrated on Figure 4 <br /> Soil boring logs are presented in Appendix A A map depicting the approximate distribution of <br /> dissolved MTBE is illustrated on Figure 5 <br /> TPH-g,TPH-d and BTEX were not detected in any of the soil samples collected and analyzed at the <br />' site since assessment activities began Only MTBE was detected in a total of twelve soil samples <br /> collected at the site The lateral and vertical extent of Impacted soil has been defined <br /> Based on the investigation to date, ground water at the site is only impacted with MTBE at <br /> concentrations requiring active site remdl tion T e veru extent of MTBE-impacted ground water <br /> has been defined at levels below the`30 Icrograms per lite , he lateral extent of MTBE-impacted <br /> ground water has generally been defined�to eve s re u^q fired for site assessment and closure Further <br /> assessment may be required to fully define the MTBE-impacted ground water vertically beyond 50 y <br />' feet bsg <br /> 4 0. POTENTIAL IMPACT ON NEARBY SURFACE AND GROUND WATER <br /> Typically, ground water would represent the migration medium for contaminants over significant <br /> horizontal distances However, sites located in up-gradient or cross-gradient directions from the site <br /> are not likely to be negatively Impacted by the sub3 ect property In addition,first encountered ground <br />' Advanced Geo$nvironmental,Inc <br />