Laserfiche WebLink
- 28 March 1997-_ = - <br /> _AGE-NC-95-0103 <br /> Page 2 of b <br /> _._ <br /> 1 Approximately 250_ cubic yards of excavated soil were transported to property owned by Mr Chapin <br /> - <br /> And aerated Confirmatory sampling has indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons were no longer <br /> present in the Temoved soil <br /> 2 3 _ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTED SOIL AND GROUND WATER <br /> In-December 1990, one ground water-monitoring well (MW-1) was installed at the site by Roger <br /> y" _ Foott Associates, Inc-The presence'of hydrocarbon-Impacted soil on the site was confirmed by <br /> analysis of soil samples collected during the Installation of MW-1 A ground water sample collected <br /> - - from MW-1 contained high-concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline <br /> ,r = (TPH-g) and volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes BTE&X) <br /> Four soiI'boririgs-were drilled at the site--by SEACOR In December 1993 Three of the borings were <br /> completed-as 2-inch diameter ground water monitoring wells (11v1W-2 through MW-4) The fourth _ <br /> - _ _ - - <br /> baring was completed as d4-inch diameter vapor extraction well (VW-l1 -Low concentrations of- <br /> petroleum lhydiocarbons weredetected in soil sarnples from MW-3,MW-4 and VW-'l Hydrocarbons <br /> were not defected in Soil-samples from MW-2 <br /> To <br /> - -= To further delineate the impacted soil, eight additional soil borings were drilled in March 1994 (B-6 <br /> through_B-13) Grab water samples were collected from seven of the borings The-assessment <br /> activities were detailed in the July 1994 Problem Assessment Repo)t (PAR) prepared by SEACOR <br /> _'- Ground water monitoring has been performed at the site on ten occasions since December 1990 Free <br /> _ product was encountered in MW-1 between 1990 and 1995 Product was also encountered in MW-4 <br /> during-the January and April 1995 sampling events Low hydrocarbon concentrations have been <br /> detected in samples collected from MW-2 and MW-5 Analytical results of ground water samples _ <br /> -are summarized 6h Table 2 <br /> 24 FEASIBILITY STUDIES <br /> �-_ Three temporary vapor wells (VW-2, VW-3 and VW-4) were Installed at the site in June 1994 for <br /> use as observation wells for a vapor extraction pilot test On June 10, 1994,-SEACOR conducted a <br /> soil vapor extraction(SVE)test at the site A=vacuum was applied to an extraction well (VW-1) and- <br /> '-¢ = measurements of flow rate and vacuum were collected from three temporary observation wells(V W- <br /> - 2,r V W-3 and VW-4) -However, a vacuum could not be achieved on VW-1, so the internal <br /> combustion (IC) unit was connected to one of the observation wells (VW-3)' SEACOR indicated <br /> that it appears VW-1 may have been placed too close to the western UST excavation which was - <br /> - backfilled with pea gravel, and "short circuited" the attempt to draw a significant vacuum <br />