COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Inspection Report; Physics International Inspection of November 14, 1996 Page 4 Leandro. His replacement as Facility Manager is Tony Meier. They told me that Mrl Meier was at a meeting at San Leandro. Ms. Davis called the San Leandro office and reached Mr. Cayere who said he would come out ito the test facility immediately but it would take him about an hour. I awhiles. Davis wasoask Mr. Cayere wa ting for him. f Hectold ould review some of the records Ms. Davis thatlthis would be acceptable. Ms. Davis brought me the manifests and LDR records, inspection records and training records. There were only three manifests in 1996. Manifest 95847850 was for shipment of photographi9c96wastes to Chemical Waste'Management at Kettleman on October 3' 1. Section VII). re was no BOE number in Block B (see Violation 1, Manifest 95144156 was for shipment of adsorbent contaminated with oil to Romic on April 17, 1996. This manife e do dDOTtdesc contin an and a Romic profile number (see ription actual description of the waste, only (Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste, Solid) roblems were observed on the Violation 1, Section VII). No other p three manifests or on the LDR notifications. On December 6, 1995 a shipment of hazardous waste was each with to Romic. This shipment consisted of four wastes, separate manifest. The numbers were 95144150, 95144152, 95144153 and 95144154. Physics International had made corrections on the last three of these manifests before shipment, but the co No ctions were not initialed (see Violation 1, Section VII). other problems were observed with the manifests or the LDR notifications. I also reviewed manifest 9 2 798o for a shipment roblems were observf photochemicals to Romic on May 1, 15 P Ms. Davis gave me a notebook containing the weekly inspection records for the hazardous waste operations. The notebook also contained a summary sheet for the year showing when the inspections had been dole and by whom. The summary sheet showed that inspections ad been missed on July 6, September 26 and October 24 and 31, 1996. The weekly inspection sheets for several weeks ending on Au ust 22, 1996 indicated that the warning signs on the and hazardous wa to sterwge area were ek of August 9e,� 19961and gs bsequentsweeksy was not made on the g problemthe had been No entry ha been made indicatintold me that ew signs had been corrected. r. Cayere subsequently installed. did not write a violation for these since Mr. Cayere informed me that the facility is presently operation as a generator only (see bjelow), and inspection records are not required of generators. Mr. Cay re and Mr. Meier arrived at about 10:15. I explained the purpose of the inspection and asked which of them could give consent. T ey told me that they Cayereere exp ai nedth atheocurrent status consent and oth gave it.