Laserfiche WebLink
Inspection Report; Physics International <br />Inspection of November 14, 1996 <br />Page 6 <br />because its routinely produced hazardous waste was well below the <br />levels which trigger the requirement. When I returned to the <br />the clean - <br />amount <br />office I revi wed the been records <br />roduc dZinT1993land 1994 by h a rhe clean <br />of hazardous aste had P produced waste <br />up and closu e activities, the amount of routinely n any ear from 1992 <br />manifested 0 <br />f_ <br />sSinceite a the on -s. s less tehan ltreatmentons land/or recycling of <br />through 1995ly reduced by the change in the <br />hazardous wa to has been sha escribed above, this claim appears <br />explosive us d in the testing <br />to be valid. <br />I revie ed the training records. No violations were observed;' <br />I star ed the facility tOffice and the maintenanceur at the used oil lshop. <br />accumulation area between the 0 acon closed head <br />This area co sists of a fenced en observed 1ah55-gallonconcrete secondary <br />containment asin and a roof. I the contents <br />steel drum ith a hazardous <br />aste startldatelof January 26, 1996. <br />were used of withof the drum. When I lifted the <br />A large fuof <br />n el was set on topin <br />funnel I fou d that the outlet tachment 2 and secureds not violation <br />Section <br />the drum (see photograph 1, A <br />VII)• en head steel drum labeled <br />There w,ras also a 55 -gallon op of <br />30, <br />"adsorbent nd oil" with an accumul thatn there was start eonly a few rdays <br />I me tioned to Mr. Cayere question <br />me about <br />1995, ere <br />left to get this drum off-site. Mr. Cay <br />is sayin that he understood that 90it cdays. ould b WhenvI returned <br />ed to the <br />this, <br />generator s orage area for an additionalHealth and Safety Code <br />to the off ce I checked EO -93 -008 -MM, do not allow <br />d 3 and Title 22, California Code of Regulations, <br />section 251 3.3( ) )1 B and confirmed that they year time <br />section 66262.34(e).( )( ) ermitted unit after the one y <br />additional torage n an unp <br />limit for a cumulation. I informed Mr. Cayere of this requirement <br />in a teleph ne conversation. <br />aste in the <br />There as one 55 -gallon steeldrum <br />the office hazardous <br />andwmaintenance <br />hazardous waste storage shed <br />violations were observed. <br />areas and the test areas. <br />unker <br />We visited the "satellite" accu <br />55 g lion closed mulation areas at bhead oth Bsteel <br />2 and Bunker 1. Both locations h <br />drums for accumulating photographic waste. The drums were outside <br />dr en. At both locations, the drum was in <br />the control room in the op No problem was observed at <br />a plastic secondary containment tub. las <br />funnel in the open <br />Bunker 2. The drum at Bunker 1 had a P Section VII)• <br />bung (see photograph 2, Attachment 2 and violation 3, tlabel plastic bag <br />I also noticed that the hazardous <br />rtha°being stuck directly to the drum. <br />taped to the drum rather <br />