Laserfiche WebLink
STEVE SHINNERS <br /> Page 2 <br /> hazardous substance or its constituents, including their toxicity, <br /> persistence and potential for migration in water, soil, and air. <br /> b) An assessment of the hydrogeologic characteristics of the site and the <br /> surrounding area where the release has migrated or may migrate. <br /> c) The CAP shall include the proximity and quality of nearby surface water <br /> or groundwater, and the current and potential beneficial uses of these <br /> waters, as well as the potential effects of residual contamination on <br /> nearby surface water and/or groundwater. <br /> i <br /> d) . A feasibility study shall evaluate alternatives for remedying or mitigating <br /> the actual or potential adverse effects of the release. Each alternative <br /> shall be evaluated for cost-effectiveness, and the responsible party(ies) <br /> shall propose to implement the most cost-effective corrective action. <br /> 1) Each recommended alternative shall!be designed to mitigate <br /> nuisance conditions and the risk of fire or explosion. <br /> 2) The Central Valley RWQCB's Basin Plan has designated all <br /> surface water and groundwater as current or potential beneficial <br /> use. Therefore, the feasibility study should also identify and <br /> evaluate at least two alternatives for restoring or protecting these <br /> beneficial uses. <br /> 3) For each release requiring a corrective action plan, PHS/EHD will <br /> inform the public of the proposed activities contained within the <br /> CAP. The notification process may include one or more of the <br /> following: <br /> a) a public notice posted at the release site; <br /> b) a public notice posted at the office of PHS/EHD; <br /> C) letters and/or public notices to individual households within <br /> the effected area; or <br /> d) personal contacts with the affected parties within the <br /> release area. <br />