Laserfiche WebLink
MMUSanta Fe Pacific Pipeline Partners, L.P. J-6075 <br /> LW July 13, 1992 Page 2 <br /> Because groundwater is only about seven feet below ground surface (BGS), <br /> and potholling to about four feet BGS is necessary for utility clearance, one <br /> sample taken at approximately five feet will be sufficient to assess the <br /> presence of hydrocarbons in the unsaturated zone. One soil sample will be <br /> collected for analysis at the top of the first encountered water-bearing zone <br /> estimated at about seven feet BGS. The analysis of this sample will provide <br /> information in regard to the presence or absence of petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> near the water table. Because we are attempting to determine the presence of <br /> light hydrocarbons which have a tendency to float, one sample taken near the <br /> bottom of the saturated column within the depth of investigation (25 feet <br /> BGS) will give the necessary vertical hydrocarbon concentration gradient <br /> information needed for this investigation. The PID will be used to field <br /> screen the samples collected. <br /> Offsite Subsurface Assessment <br /> The Port of Stockton, in conjunction with the Technical Committee are in the <br /> process of conducting an assessment for the entire Port of Stockton; therefore, <br /> offsite work has not been included within the scope of this preliminary <br /> investigation. <br /> Boring I Monitoring Well Placement Between M-1 & EB-3 <br /> We will place an exploratory boring (EB-4) between existing monitoring well <br /> M-1 and proposed boring EB-3 for further definition of potential hydrocarbon <br /> impacted soils in that area. The soil samples obtained for chemical analysis <br /> from this boring will then be placed on hold by the analytical laboratory. If <br /> the chemical analysis of the soil samples collected in borings EB-1, EB-2 or EB- <br /> 3 indicate the soils are impacted by hydrocarbons, the samples from boring <br /> EB-4 will be analyzed to further assess the impact in that area. Our rationale <br /> is that the area where EB-1 and EB-2 are proposed is the most likely source <br /> area of onsite hydrocarbon impact. If we find this area not significantly <br /> impacted, then the possibility of an onsite source and downgradient <br /> migration of hydrocarbons is reduced. A site plan showing existing and <br /> proposed exploratory borings and monitoring wells is attached to this letter. <br /> Monitoring Well Installation Between M-3 & M-6 <br /> We will move the location of proposed well M-6 along the northwest <br /> property boundary to help identify the presence of potential upgradient <br /> hydrocarbon sources as requested by the RWQCB. The proposed monitoring <br /> wells M-5 and M-6 should be sufficient to identify the potential for the <br /> presence of upgradient sources. <br />