Laserfiche WebLink
ARAR Memorandum -2- 16 September 1991 <br /> DDRW, Sharpe Site <br /> receiving water quality. This Plan includes chemical and location specific <br /> ARARs. <br /> 4. Compilation of Water Quality Goals - This staff report contains numerical limits <br /> used to implement the narrative water quality objectives of the Water Quality <br /> Control Plans. The most pertinent narrative objective is that ground and <br /> surface waters shall not contain chemical constituents that adversely affect <br /> beneficial uses. Water quality goals are potential chemical and location <br /> specific ARARs. <br /> 5. Statement of Policy with respect to Maintaining High Quality of Waters in <br /> California, State Board Resolution No. 68-16 (Anti-degradation Policy) - This <br /> resolution requires the continued maintenance of high quality waters of the <br /> state even where the quality is greater than needed to protect all beneficial <br /> uses. This resolution has been incorporated into the Water Quality Control <br /> Plans and it is a chemical and location specific ARAR. <br /> 6. The Policy defining 'Sources of Drinking Water' , State Water Resources Control <br /> Board Resolution 88-63. This Policy states that, "All surface and ground waters <br /> of the state are considered to be suitable, or potentially suitable, for <br /> municipal or domestic water supply. . . ", with only a few specific exceptions. <br /> The policy is intended to clarify the applicability of this beneficial use <br /> designation in cases where the Water Quality Control Plans may not provide <br /> definitive designations. This resolution has been incorporated into the Water <br /> Quality Control Plans and it is a chemical and location specific ARAR. <br /> The recommended disposal alternative is still in the conceptual stage. Until we <br /> receive more information on specific disposal methods and on the quality of the <br /> treated ground water, we are unable to provide actual action or chemical specific <br /> numerical ARARs. <br /> The following more specific comments were developed after reviewing the Draft FS <br /> Report: <br /> 1. The Conclusions section, on page 1-114, state that nitrate will not be addressed <br /> in any remedial action objectives. All disposal alternative for treated ground <br /> water will have to consider nitrate. <br /> 2. Table 2.2-1 lists compounds which pose a threat to human health and the <br /> environment. These compounds as well as any other compounds including metals <br /> that exceed or could potentially exceed background or upgradient concentrations <br /> in the receiving water, as a result of the disposal of treated ground water, <br /> will have to comply with the State of California's Antidegradation Policy and <br /> the Basin Plan. <br /> 3. Section 2.2.4 describes Cleanup Objectives. <br /> a. Table 2.2-3 appears to reflect the appropriate numerical values with a few <br /> exceptions, including arsenic, toluene and benzene. Table 2.2-3 needs to be <br /> revised to reflect the numerical values from Tables 1 and 2 in the <br /> California Inland Surface Water Plan. The table should be expanded to <br /> include all Title 22 metals. <br />