Laserfiche WebLink
-- UPGRRDIENT ENVIR 2097723620 '" • "� <br /> Late 1997—Gillics Trucking and UEC receive verbal requests from EHD requesting <br /> additional site assessment <br /> December 1997--UEC submits Fourth Quarter report,recommending that preparation of <br /> the CAP be postponed because groundwater concentrations have stabilized or declined <br /> and corrective action may not be necessary <br /> December 1997--UEC contacts Mike Mosbacher at State UST Cleanup Fund to discuss <br /> the possibility of appealing recent requests from EHD for additional site assessment; <br /> Mosbacher agrees that further assessment should be postponed and the case should be <br /> discussed with James Munch at UST Fund <br /> January 1998--Jeff Wong replaces Steve Sasson as lead regulator <br /> January 1998--UEC contacts James Munch at the State Water Board and requests <br /> information on appeal process (no information ever received) <br /> July 1998--Dave Deaner,head of State UST Cleanup Fund informs Gillies Trucking that <br /> he will perform the 5-year review of the case to determine whether it is a candidate for <br /> site closure,unless Gillies requests that this review not be performed; (it appears that this <br /> review was not performed,for unknown reasons) <br /> September 1998--EHD and Gillies Trucking meet to discuss EHD's request for additional <br /> assessment <br /> October 1998--EHD submits summary letter of meeting, directing Gillies Trucking to <br /> install"two additional wells to complete the vertical delineation of the contamination, to <br /> calculate the mass of the contamination,and to investigate the groundwater above the <br /> existing monitoring well screen intervals."EHD also requested a receptor survey and a <br /> fate-and-transport model. <br /> October 1998--UEC contacts EHD to request that the PAR be reviewed again and that <br /> EHD reconsider its request for further assessment <br /> November 1998--UEC again contacts UST Fund requesting information on appeal <br /> process <br /> January 1999--Yulya Davidova of UST Cleanup Fund responds to UEC request;informs <br /> UEC that UST Fund management agrees that further assessment is unnecessary,and <br /> would support Gillies if Mr. Gillies submits an appeal. However, due to the 1-2 year <br /> appeal process and the difficulty of dealing with San Joaquin County EHD, the Fund <br /> would consent to reimburse the costs to comply with the EIiD directive if Mr. Gillics <br /> chooses not to file an appeal.Davidova instructs UEC to submit a cost pre-approval <br /> request for a work plan. <br />