Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Katie L. Hower Project 22560-203.002 <br /> July 2, 1997 <br /> Page 4 <br /> analyzed for PAHs by EPA Method 8310. A duplicate sample, collected from MW-3, was <br /> analyzed for TPHG, TPHD, and BTEX by the same methods. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Site Hydrogeology <br /> On May 29, 1997, before collecting groundwater samples, the depth to groundwater was <br /> measured in the monitoring wells using an electronic sounder. The depths to groundwater <br /> were used, along with surveyed wellhead elevations, to calculate groundwater elevations <br /> in the vicinity of the wells. The groundwater elevations were used to construct a <br /> groundwater contour map (Figure 3). The data collected from the wells indicate a <br /> hydraulic gradient of 0.0012 and a groundwater flow direction to the north-northwest. <br /> Although the groundwater flow direction has fluctuated slightly since March 1997, the <br /> present flow direction is consistent with the previous flow direction. In addition, under <br /> the present hydraulic gradient, monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3 are still directly <br /> downgradient of the petroleum-hydrocarbon impacted soils. <br /> Soils encountered within the saturated zone in the vicinity of hydrocarbon-impacted soils, <br /> identified by borings GP-6 and GP-12, consist predominantly of sandy gravels with lesser <br /> sands and silty sands. An estimate of the hydraulic conductivity for the sandy gravel can <br /> be made by comparison to tables in Driscoll, 19866. The value for hydraulic conductivity <br /> for a sandy gravel is approximately 102 ft/day. The value for effective porosity for a sandy <br /> gravel is approximately 25%. A groundwater (seepage) velocity within the sandy gravel <br /> can be estimated using Darcy's formula. <br /> v= Ki/n, <br /> where <br /> v = groundwater or seepage velocity <br /> K= Hydraulic conductivity = 102 ft/day <br /> i = Hydraulic gradient= 0.0012 <br /> ne = Effective porosity= 0.25 <br /> Using the values listed above, the groundwater velocity in the vicinity of monitoring wells <br /> MW-1 and MW-3 was calculated to be 0.48 ft/day or 180 ft/yr. If petroleum-hydrocarbon <br /> 6 Driscoll,G.F. 1986. Groundwater and wells. St. Paul,Minnesota: Johnson Division. <br /> mcon <br /> FRE:\H:\WINWORD\MP2QT97.DOC-97\jes:2 <br />