COMPLIANCE INFO_2010 - 2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SWRCB, January 2002 Page of 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING a Facility is clot Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ❑ Industry Standard X Professional Engineer ❑Other(Spec) Test Method Used: ❑Pressure ❑Vacuum X Hydrostatic ❑Other(Speer) "fest Equipment Used: Caldwell Level Change Indicator Equipment Resolution: .002 Fill Sump # 1 Fill Sump #2 _--Fill Sump#3 Fill Sump It Sump Diameter: 48" 48" 48" s Sump Depth: 78" — 78" -- -- 780" - -- Height fi•on-i Tank Top to Top of No Piping No Piping No'Piping Highest Piping Penetration: Penetrations Penetrations Penetrations _ Height from Tank Top to Lowest 39" 41" 35" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to Dry Dry Dry testing: Portion of Sump Tested Water Level 41" Water Level 43" Water Level 38" _ Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fibergla s Wait time between applying 5 Minutes 5 Minutes 5 Minutes water and starting test: _ Test Start Time: 7:25 8:15 _ 9:05_ Initial Reading(Rj): .001 .001 J001 Test End Time: 7:55 8:45 9:35 _ Final Reading(RF): .001 .001 .001 Test Duration: 30 Minutes 30 Minutes 30 Minutes Change in Reading(RF-Rj): 0 0 0 — Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .005/30 Minutes .005/30 Minutes .005/39 Minutes _ Test Result: X Pass ❑Fail X Pass ❑Fail X Pasj ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? X Yes ❑No X Yes ❑No X Yes No ❑Yes ❑No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is X Yes ❑No ❑NA X Yes ❑No ❑NA X Yes ❑No ENA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA detected? Was sensor removed for testing? X Yes ❑No ❑NA X Yes ❑No ❑NA X Yes ❑lNo ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No E NA Was sensor properly replaced and X Yes ❑No ❑NA X Yes ❑No ❑NA X Yes ❑INo ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No 0 NA verified functional after testing? Comments — (include infavnation on repairs made prior to testing, and t-ecommendedfollow-up forfailed tests) _