Laserfiche WebLink
t� ail <br /> • 31 July 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0249 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The implications from the May 2000 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> • With a ground water low reported at MW-6, ground water flow direction at the site appeared <br /> to be oriented generally towards the southwest at a gradient of approximately 0 003, due to <br /> the low gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water measurements or changes of <br /> recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly modify ground water flow <br /> direction <br /> • Ground water flow direction at the site may have been influenced by pumping of the Three <br /> B's Truck Plaza domestic drinking water well <br /> • The ground water elevation at the site was within the screened intervals of wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-6 <br /> • Ground water elevation at the site decreased an average 3 98 feet from the February 2000 <br /> ground water monitoring event to the May 2000 ground water monitoring event <br /> • • A correlation was observed at wells MW-2 and MW-3 between increasing/decreasing TPH-g <br /> and BTEX concentrations and increasing/decreasing ground water elevations, a weaker <br /> correlation may be observed at MW-1 <br /> • The lateral extent of the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plume is not known toward the <br /> south, southwest, west, northwest, north and northeast of the current area bound by wells <br /> MW-i through MW-6, the vertical extent is not known <br /> • The elevated petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations detected in water samples collected from <br /> wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 (screened between 5 and 25 feet bsg) suggest that these wells <br /> may be screened within or near the "core area" of the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> plume The area of greatest dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon-impact was observed in the <br /> area near MW-3 (Figure 4) <br /> • Elevated concentrations of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the samples <br /> collected from well MW-6, the TPH-g and TPH-d contour maps (Figures 4 and 5) suggest <br /> a secondary dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plume in the area of MW-6 <br /> • The area of highest MTBE-impact appears to be the areas near well MW-4 and MW-6 <br /> • Laboratory results of grab ground water samples suggest that there is not an MTBE-impact <br /> to the domestic drinking water well at this time <br /> • AGE suspects the ethanol detected in DW-1 (May 2000)"grab"ground water sample was due <br /> to the coated bentonite pellets utilized during construction of well MW-13 Samples of the <br /> . `/4-inch coated bentonite pellets (Sinclair Services)were submitted in a VOA container filled <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />