My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009335
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545660
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 2:42:17 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 2:10:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009335
RECORD_ID
PR0545660
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003909
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' A total A42 ORC' socks were emplaced in the source wells on April 3 <br /> P ► <br /> 1995. The system was monitored for 3, 5, 9, 12, 20, 30, 47, 60, 75, 93, 200, <br /> 288, and 365 days after ORC` emplacement to determine changes in DO and <br /> BTEX concentrations in the ground water. Morutor points were attached at three <br />' depths (2.1 m, 4 3 m, and 6 4 m) to the exterior of the source well screens dunag <br /> installauon so that DO and BTEX levels could be monitored at the barter with <br /> auiumal disturbance of the ORC*in the source wells. Additional up-gradient and <br />' down-gradient monitor points and monitor wells were sampled to determine both <br /> the horizontal and lateral distribution of DO througbout the aquifer, and the <br /> biodegradation of BTEX in the aquifer as a result of the increase of DO. <br />' ANALYTICAL METHODS <br /> Temperature, pH, conductivity, and DO were monitored on site A Hydae <br />' water meter was used for meawnng the pH, conductivity, and temperature of all <br /> ground water samples collected in the field. To provide accurate information at a <br /> reasonable cost; field screening procedures were used for monitoring DO and BTEX <br />' concentrations throughout DO levels were measured in the field using the Hach- <br /> Modified Winkler digital titration method Ground water samples were collected in <br />' 4C�-ml VOA vials, preserved with mercuric chloride, placed on ice, and transported <br /> back to the office where BTEX concentrations were measured using Ohinicrorn <br /> Total BTEX RaPID Assays®immunoassay Test Kits Duplicate samples, collected <br />' for laboratory analysis of BTS and TPH using EPA Methods 8020 and 8015 <br /> Modified, were collected in 40-m1 VOA vials, preserved with mercuric chloride, <br /> placed on ice, and transported directly to the laboratory. <br /> RESULTS OF ANALYSIS <br /> The collected data were analyzed to deterriune interactions between the <br />' added ORCand the BTEX plume The change in DO concentrations was <br /> determined by contouring the distribution of uutlal oxygen and the increase in total <br />' oxygen These calculauons were performed to determine background conditions <br /> and conditions at monitoring events for operating the full-scale system The same <br /> approach was used for estimating change in the total BTEX in the aquifer. <br />' Anal Analysis. The volume of DO was calculated using Surfer for Windows, a <br /> contouring and three-dimensional surface mapping software (Golden Software <br />' 1994). The values for the three methods, Trapezoidal Rule, Simpson's Rule, and <br /> Simpson's 3/8 Rule, were averaged and then used for determining trends. The <br /> same procedures used for the analysis of the DO concentrations were used for <br />' BTEX A porton of each plot upgradient of the source wells was blanked out <br /> during the calculations to determine a more realistic area of consideration. The <br /> bla iltang set the values for the upgradient concentrations to zero. This prevented <br />' values to be extrapolated into areas without monitoring points (no data to support). <br /> In a previous publication (Odencrantz et al , 1996) the blaming was not performed <br />' which showed a considerable different `macroscope' behavior of the system 'The <br /> source well monitor points at 4 3 m below ground level were used <br /> 1 <br /> 90 " d dGZ = 90 66-tit-7Da❑ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.