Laserfiche WebLink
The rest Pof the analysis showed that there was an increase in DO <br /> downgradient of the barer and a change in BTEX concentrations. Upon ORC' <br /> addition, there was evidence of dispersion of oxygen downgradtent by Day 9. <br /> There was also a marked decrease in the size of the BT-Ex plume. It was apparent <br />' from the contour plots that the plume was retreating and was in the process of <br /> being `cut-off" from any further downgradient migration. The BTEX levels <br /> showed an initial drop until Day 20. This was followed by an increase in BTEX <br />' levels until Day 75 The iruaal decrease was during a penod of a rising ground <br /> water table and the increase of BTEX concentrations was during a period of a <br /> falling ground water. The water table elevations for monitor well SH-5, located <br />' I rn upgradient of the barer are shown in Figure 2 <br /> The results of the analysis, presented as nonnahzed mass curves for DO and <br /> BTEX, for the areal analysis over a one-year period are summarized in Figure 3. <br />' <br /> Cross-Sectional Analysis The same methods used for determinin the volumes <br /> s <br /> of DO and BTEX for the areal analysis were used for the crass-sectional analysis. <br />' Contour plots were made of the DO and BTEX concentrations in a cross-section <br /> across the face of each of the barriers <br />' The average DO background concentration was 1.4 mg/L and 1 8 mg/L for <br /> the long bares and the short barer, respectively The results of the data analysis <br /> indicated there was an increase of DO above background levels during the first <br />' nine days. The average concentration for DO reached a maximum of 13.1 mg/L <br /> and 14 8 mg/L on Day 9 for each of the barriers. Individual maximum levels <br /> grater than 20 mg/L DO were achieved at the long barrier and there was a general <br /> decrease in DO after the initial increase. Levels of DO were maintained greater <br /> than background levels (1 to 2 mg/L) for more than 200 days after the <br /> emplacement of the ORC' The ORC' was replaced in half of the source wells <br /> 275 days a-fter initial emplacement DO levels in the vicinity of the wells where <br /> the ORC` was replaced again increased to above 10 mg/L. The levels in the <br /> vidrury of wells that did not have the ORC' replaced were still above background <br />' levels at 365 days after initial emplacement. <br /> The analysis of the BTEX data showed an overall decrease in BTEX levels <br /> across the bamer Average background BTEX concentrations were 2 3 mg/L and <br /> 14 mgfL for the long and short bare=s, respectively. There was a slight increase <br /> in the average. BTEX concentrations to 2.6 mglL and 2.1 mg./L on Day 3. There <br />' was an overall decrease in BTEX concentrations through Day 93. There was a <br /> slight increase in BTEX concentrations measured on Day 47 and just before the <br /> parnal replacement of the OAC' on Day i90 There was an overall decrease <br />' following the partial replacement. <br /> The results of the analysis, presented as normalized mass curves for DO and <br /> BTEX, for the two barriers over a one-year period are summarized in Figure 4 and <br />' Figure 5. <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> LO ' d d0E = 90 66-fi1 -tea0 <br />