Laserfiche WebLink
' 30 May 2001 <br />' AGE-NC Project No 95-0143 <br /> Page 7of8 <br />' Ground water elevation decreased approximately 0 54 feet between November 2000 and <br /> February2001 Groundwater elevation was within the screened interval of MW-17,MW-22, <br /> MW-23, MW-24 and the five vapor extraction wells, but above the screened interval of the <br />' other eight monitoring wells The exposed portion of the screened interval in the five vapor <br /> extraction wells was within a silty layer and dust above a sandy layer The inferred ground <br />' water flow direction remains variably toward the north to northeast at the site <br /> • Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in water samples from four of the nine wells sampled <br /> at concentrations ranging from. 100 gg/l (MW-6) to 160,000 gg/l (MW-3) MTBE was not <br />' detected in ground water samples collected during the February 2001 monitoring event Only <br /> minor concentrations (less than 7 gg/1) of DIPE and TBA have been detected since <br /> monitoiing began in 1997 <br />' • TPH-g, BTEX and MTBE were not detected above laboratory reporting limits in the soil <br /> vapor sample collected on 15 February 2001 from the influent vapor stream of the SVE unit <br />' Significant decreases in soil vapor concentrations have occurred since early April 2000 As <br /> discussed in AGE's Quarterly Report-Fourth Quarter 2000, dated 11 April 2000, the drop <br /> in soil vapor concentrations coincides with an increase in ground water elevation Elevated <br />'• ground water levels appear to degrade the effectiveness of the horizontal vapor extraction <br /> system Additionally, the exposed screened intervals of the vertical extraction wells were <br /> within a sandy to clayey silt layer, the characteristics of which, combined with the high <br /> I ground water elevation, may limit the effectiveness of the vertical vapor extraction wells <br /> Furthermore, vertical vapor extraction well VW-3 was found to be filled with clean sand to <br /> approximately 15 feet bsg during the February 2001 monitoring event It appears that the <br />' well screen may have collapsed, allowing the filter pack to infiltrate the well VW-3 is <br /> located in the area most impacted by the petroleum hydrocarbon release <br />' TPH-g and BTEX compounds were detected in two analyzed soil samples collected from <br /> boi ing EW-3 The average concentrations of TPH-g and BTEX detected in samples analyzed <br /> from EW-3 during the March 2001 soil investigation were lower than the average <br /> concentrations detected in soil samples collected at similar depths from vapor extraction well <br /> VW-5, aistalled during the first quarter of 1999 VW-5 and EW-3 are approximately 5 feet <br /> apart Considering the proximity of the two sampling locations and the laboratory data, it <br /> appears that a degree of attenuation has occurred in soil since installation of the remediation <br /> system Analytical results of soil samples are summarized in Table 7, soil analysis for VW-5 <br /> is also included for comparison <br /> 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> . Based upon data collected during the February2001 and previous sampling events and SVE system <br /> Imonitoring results, AGE recommends <br /> ,Advanced GeoEnvironmentul,Int, <br />