My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008902
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VAN BUREN
>
424
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545786
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 2:43:10 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 2:20:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008902
RECORD_ID
PR0545786
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0004969
FACILITY_NAME
CHASE CHEVROLET
STREET_NUMBER
424
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
VAN BUREN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
424 N VAN BUREN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
364
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 August 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0143 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br /> 214 Logging <br /> During drilling activities, soil sample duplicates were monitored for the presence of organic vapor <br /> using an organic vapor meter equipped with a photo-ionization detector (PID Thermo <br /> Environmental 580A, 10 0 eV, calibrated to isobutylene) and were visually described on boring logs <br /> in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) Boring logs are included as <br /> Appendix A <br /> 2 2 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> On 10 to 12 May 2000, a Sohnst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground water <br /> in eight monitoring wells and five vapor extraction wells at the site and in fifteen monitoring wells <br /> at the Madison site relative to the tops of the well casings The groundwater elevations and hydraulic <br /> gradient were determined from these data(Table 3) <br /> After measurement of depths to water, each monitoring well at the site was purged using a two-stage <br /> submersible purge punnp The pump was decontaminated prior to purging each well using an <br /> • Alconox solution and clean tap water Temperature, pH and conductivity of the purged water were <br /> measured at regular intervals during purging using a Hydac water analyzer Approximately twelve <br /> to eighteen gallons of water were removed from each well except for MW-9, from which sixty <br /> gallons of water were purged (approximately three well volumes) All purged water was stored in <br /> 55-gallon DOT-approved drums on-site Field data and field logs are included in Appendix C <br /> 23 COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Water samples were collected from each purged well using new, disposable bailers and, upon <br /> retrieval,were transferred into 40-nil EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric <br /> acid as a sample preservative The samples were labeled and transported under chain-of-custody, in <br /> a chilled container, to McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI), a DHS-certified laboratory, and were <br /> analyzed for <br /> • TPH-g in accordance with EPA Methods 5030/8015m, <br /> • BTEX in accordance with EPA Method 8020/602, and <br /> • Fuel oxygenates di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), MTBE, <br /> tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME) and tertiary butanol (TBA) m accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8260M <br /> • <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.