Laserfiche WebLink
this is possible. <br /> • Mitigation measures for transportation impacts should be <br /> required. <br /> • On page 4 . 14-42 the EIR proposes a monitoring program to be <br /> put in place to assure a high rate of internal travel. This <br /> relates to Mitigation Measure 4 . 14-1(g) , which ties traffic <br /> and land use occupancy into the same monitoring program. This <br /> would put the County in the position of denying Phase II of <br /> this project if a certain number of jobs have not been <br /> created. He thought this proposal was unworkable. <br /> • At this hearing it was stated that there is new traffic data <br /> and new layouts and the City would like to review those prior <br /> to the Final EIR. He requested that the current EIR be <br /> recirculated to show that data for his review. <br /> Tracy City Manager Mike Locke made the following points: <br /> • The basic model that was used to analyze fiscal impact, in <br /> terms of the operations' side of this, was the City of Tracy' s <br /> fiscal model. In so doing, however, there were a significant <br /> number of alterations to that model. <br /> • On Table 4 . 9-6, under Fiscal Impacts, (that is page 4 . 9-13 , ) <br /> there is a list of services with costs. This came from their <br /> activity budget format from the City model, which has 64 <br /> items. Some of the costs are offset by "net County costs, " <br /> where revenues are offset by overhead operating costs. He <br /> said that is a valid concept, but the City believes a signifi- <br /> cant number of factors were left out. For example, police <br /> services, youth services, technical services and narcotics <br /> were left out of the model. Police service expenses = $11. 70 <br /> per capita (in table) , but an additional $20. 73 was left out. <br /> • There are three activities under "Administration, " _ $22 . 60 <br /> per capita, but another five activities are left out, _ <br /> $60.26. "Planning/Building Inspections" is considered as "fee <br /> pass-through, " so it is "fee neutral. " He said he would <br /> generally agree with that. "Public Works/Engineering" has <br /> four activity areas. However, he said he believed that there <br /> are four additional activities that are not shown, that are <br /> not "fee neutral. " These include "pavement maintenance, " <br /> "street tree maintenance, " "street sweeping maintenance, " and <br /> "building maintenance. " These equal $27 per capita. <br /> • For "Recreation, " a footnote indicates that a 54% fee-driven <br /> factor is assumed for all parks and recreation services, so <br /> expenses are discounted by that factor. However, three items <br /> are left out, including "aquatics, " "senior citizens, " and <br /> "community facilities. " The Mountain House developer says <br /> that all of these services would be included in the New Town <br /> project. These would equal $6.50 per capita, or double what is <br /> shown. <br /> • If you take all these cumulative costs, it' s $139 . 90 per <br /> capita. He said he believed another $114. 94 per capita is not <br /> shown as expenses. All of these expenses are not assumed in <br /> the County's administrative overhead, that is assumed to be in <br /> PC MINUTES -8- JAN 16 , 1992 <br />