Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB. January 2002 FINAL DRAFT <br />6. PIPING SUMP TESTING <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />Test Method Developed By: Ej Sump Manufacturer Industry Standard M Professional Engineer <br />0 other (Specwy) <br />Test Method Used: El Pressure El vacuum. Z Hydrostatic <br />■ Other (Specify) <br />Equipment Resolution: 0.0025" <br />Sump <br />882-D IU2 <br />1� Sump Diameter: <br />Sump Depth from TOP of Tank: <br />_36.0'_' <br />Sump Material: <br />FRP <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />17.75" <br />Condition of sump prior to testing: <br />Depth of Sump Tested' <br />19.501, <br />Does turbine shut down when <br />sump sensor detects liquid (both <br />product and water)?* <br />[:]Yes []No [ENA <br />_1No RNA <br />Flyes EjNo ONA <br />Flyes FINo ONA <br />Turbine shutdown response time: <br />Suction System <br />_]No E]NA <br />F <br />El s E]No []NA <br />OYes ONo EINA <br />Was fail-safe verified to be <br />I ional? <br />[:]Yes ONo ONA <br />nYes FlNo [:INA <br />nYes []No [_]NA <br />[:]Yes [:]No []NA 1 <br />i Wait time between applying <br />MV71&17r11"Mq <br />Test End Time: <br />Change in Reading (RF-Rj): <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Critei <br />SOL,= <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />E]Yes F]No DNA J <br />Elyes, E]No ONA IMHVMH <br />► ■ <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />after testing? <br />[EYes ONo MNA <br />MYes E]No [INA <br />MYes jffNo E]NA <br />- Comments — (Include information ior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests.) <br />If the entire depth of the sump is not tested, specif�, how much was tested. If the answer to M of the questions indicated with an <br />asterisk (*) is "Nff', then the entire sump should be tested. (See SWRCB LG -160) <br />