Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB., Januar), 2002 0 FINAL DRAFT 0 <br />9- FILY, RTSF.R CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br />0'8 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />Aot Eqt—up—ped With Fill Riser Containinent Ziurnp(s)■ <br />resent, but were Not Tested <br />Fill Riser Containutent Sumps are P■ <br />Test Method Developed By Sump, Manufacturer E-1 Industry Standard r-1 Professional Engineer <br />Other (Specif <br />Test Method Used: Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic <br />■ O <br />Test Equipment Used: Equipment Resolution: <br />jV11 <br />�� 1 �, 1 i <br />Sump Diameter: <br />Stunp, Depth: <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Hiehes"Oi )jung Penetration: <br />Height ftom Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />Conditioniof sump prior b <br />testing: <br />bit -0, IS .74 <br />Sump Nbterial: <br />Wait time between applying <br />li pressure/vacuurn/water and <br />starting test: <br />WV4FW1FTA—M I I I <br />Sm sm. 10mr, <br />r <br />Change in Reading (RF -R-1): <br />o- Criteria <br />Pass/Fail Tliresl�or <br />0#iii <br />NMI <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />No <br />m <br />Does the sensor alann when <br />eidier product or n2ter is <br />detected? <br />---es <br />s EINo EINA <br />E]Yes ONo ONA <br />Was sonstrxenmvet for testing? <br />IMMMOM, MIN MiMMIMM <br />0 Mv -1 <br />Rommm, sm, momms <br />M6. me M., <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? <br />Ej Yes EINA <br />I il, 57 1 M I ffM <br />0 0 1 m a <br />Comments — fInclude h7forination on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollom-up for failed tests.) <br />No" Fill Riser Contaimuent Surup". <br />