ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012662 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Coca-Cola Enterprises - West 1 Job No. 90054 3-5 at 20 feet which contained concentrations of 30,000 ppb, 32,000 ppb, 3,300 ppb and 54,000 -- ppb, respectively. These concentrations correspond to a hthalene.) All other polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons were below detection limits. Total BTEX concentrations were found to be slightly more widespread at the site,but in 'general correlated with the reported TPH concentrations around the former gasoline UST. The .greatest concentrations of BTEX were reported from soil samples in boring B-5 at a depth of 20 feet (1,910,000 ppb). Soil samples from perimeter boring B-7, B-8, B-9, B-10, B-11 and B-13 all contained concentrations below laboratory detection limits except boring 13-13 at 70 feet which contained 126 ppb. This anomolous concentration may have been due to cross-contamination. µ_ All organic lead values were below laboratory detection limits except boring B5 at a depth of 20 feet (0.059 ppm). The analytical chemistry test results for the disposal parameters indicated a non-hazardous material with a pH of 8.2 to 8.7 and a flashpoint of >1W Celsius. The soil samples were x. found to be non-reactive to sulfide and water. A reactive cyanide concentration of 73 ppm was noted in the soil sample collected in the outside soil stockpile. Reactive cyanide was not detected in the inside soil stockpile. The analysis for EP Toxicity metals indicated that all F metals analyzed were within the acceptable total threshold limit concentrations. Industrial solvents were not identified in the composite soil samples. The static acute hazardous waste bioassay analysis indicated the soil was of non-hazardous material. 5.2 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL TEST RESULTS J The results of the chemical analysis for groundwater samples are presented in Table 5 and are illustrated on Figure 9. All TPH, PIMA, lead, and BTEX concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/I) which is equivalent to parts per billion. 6 The analytical test results of the groundwater samples collected at the site indicate that very minor concentrations of dissolved phase contamination exists under the site. No free product was observed to be present in any of the groundwater monitoring wells. F Groundwater samples analyzed for total r-►roleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline were E.