My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2012-2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COLEY
>
1812
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231881
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2012-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2022 11:15:56 AM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:59:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2012-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231881
PE
2371
FACILITY_ID
FA0003946
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T California - UG010
STREET_NUMBER
1812
STREET_NAME
COLEY
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Escalon
Zip
95320
APN
22715414
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1812 Coley Ave
P_LOCATION
06
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2371_PR0231881_1812 COLEY_2012-2018.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
288
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 0 0 RECEIVED <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />2014 <br />Software Version Installed: 120.00 <br />Complete the following checklist- ENVIRONMENTAL <br />Yes � No _..larmope._� _. � ... <br />r * Is the audible alarm rational? <br />Yes No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br />r Yesf No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested and confinned operational? <br />* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment <br />will not interfere with their <br />ro r o eration? <br />F Yes F No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />N/A operational? <br />r Yes F No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary <br />Fo N/A containment monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which <br />sensors initiate positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) <br />Sump/TrenchSensors; FDispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut-down <br />due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? <br />Yes; No. <br />F Yes r— No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />F N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the ove�ll warning alarm visible and audible at the <br />tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? <br />F Yes* F No Was any monitoring p <br />�a q ui�ment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment <br />replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />Yes* No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that <br />apply) F Product, F Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E below. <br />Yes f No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />Yes No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />* In SectionE below, describe how and when these deficiencies were orwill be corrected <br />E. Comments: <br />Other sensors from page one: <br />L3 Vent Sump 794380-208/ 515989: Certified. <br />L4 Transition Sump 794380-208/ 514107: Certified. <br />L5 - Inside Piping Pan 794390-420/793173 <br />The drop tube is equipped with a mechanical overfill prevention valve. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.