Laserfiche WebLink
I. Introduction <br /> impact can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Wherever the implementation of mitigation <br /> measures has the potential to generate significant impacts,this possibility is also noted and the <br /> significance of those potential impacts is evaluated. <br /> Alternatives <br /> The discussion of project alternatives includes a no project alternative, an off-site alternative,a <br /> current-footprint-with-increased-elevation alternative,and a current-footprint-with-increased- <br /> elevation-and-creek-realignment-to-the-south alternative. The evaluation focuses on alternatives <br /> that may be capable of eliminating significant adverse environmental effects of the project,or <br /> reducing them to a level of insignificance,even if the alternative would impede to some degree <br /> the attainment of the project objectives,or would be more costly. Effects of the alternatives are <br /> identified and compared to project impacts. <br /> REFERENCES-Introduction <br /> R.W. Beck,Final Design Study Report for the Austin Road Landfill Expansion,November <br /> 1992. <br /> Miller, Mike, Solid Waste Manager,City of Stockton,Department of Public Works, <br /> correspondence, March 17, 1993. <br /> Martin,Chandler,Planner,San Joaquin County Planning Department,telephone conversation, <br /> March 26,1993. <br /> I.10 <br />