ARCHIVED REPORTS_2004_1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TZECTOR ENGINEERING INC. DAILY CONSTRUCTION FIELD REPORT Project Name: Project No. Daily Field Report Sequence Number: Forward Landfill 021605.03 44 Location of Work: Client Or Manager Date: Day of The Week: Manteca,Ca Butch Stefan Forward,Inc. October 27, 2003 Monday General Contractor: Liner Contractor: Project Engineer: Sukut Construction GSE San eeta Lewis General Foreman: Liner Superintendent: Other: Jim Hasal Are Khounmouan Source and Description of Fill Material: Weather: CQA Technician: On site native, stockpiled,light brown silty Hot, clear and Ken Davila CLAY breezy Equipment on site: 1-D6 dozer, 1-water truck, 1-633 scra er, 1- 16G blade, 1-backhoe, 1-trencher NOTES(Describe work completed during the day,any problems and their solutions): I arrived on site and met with Jim H. (Sukut superintendent)in the early morning to discuss the day's plan of attack. General earthworks operations continued with the one(1) scraper hauling minor amounts of excess clay from the leachate pond floor and windrows generated by the blade. The one(1)blade continued to finish cut the clay on the cell floor with the smooth edges. The D6 dozer cleaned and widened the access road into the cell which will be used for general truck access. Review of the roll certifications of the Bentofix GCL and the geotextile(16oz)material continued as time permitted. On site lab testing of the clay material continued with the completion of the two(2)final Atterberg limits tests. Calculations and test plotting were performed and completed the required minimum testing frequency for Atterberg limits. One permeability drive tube sample was transported to off site Vector personnel for testing in the Vector laboratory. Eight(8)nuclear moisture density tests were performed on the clay at random locations and elevations throughout the day. All tests passed the 90 % compaction specification and also passed in moisture content. The on site foreman for Sukut was verbally informed of the test results. The foreman for GSE was briefly on site to discuss the liner deployment schedule and manpower. The design engineer for BAS was contacted in the early morning to inform him that the lechate pond anchor trench had to be relocated because of the close proximity to the existing gas monitoring well. He stated that it would be acceptable to move the trench in a maximum of one(1)foot. This would make the distance from the crest of slope to four feet(4')instead of out to five feet(5'). He also stated that the width of the anchor trench could be made thinner, from three feet(3')wide to two feet(2')wide. The trencher and backhoe began anchor trench excavation around the lechate pond by midmorning. Mike Q. (Quartaroli Surveying)was on site in the afternoon to survey points in the sump area of the FU- 03 cell. Prepared By: Reviewed By: 4/23/03,Rev. 0 1 of 1 r-,7