ARCHIVED REPORTS_2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Joyesh (Sold Waste) visited the site in afternoon. I explained to him SG -11 and that my opinion was SG -11 I would function properly with one less foot of perforation I deep probe because gravel pack was built to design depth. Kevin (Public Works) called me and I explained to him the same thing. On the matter of the top of the deep probe only extending above ground surface 2 ft, I provided my opinion that the function of the probe would only be negligibly impacted with the shortened length, and that some of the options the contractor could consider would be to either make the monument shorter or put a fitting on the end of the probe to each the top of the monument. Mark later showed me a fitting he could attach to the top of the probe to make it reach the top of the monument. I said that looked OK, but he'd have to get approval from Kevin/Joyesh. 4:00 pm: Left site. I of I VECTOR ENGINEERING, INC. . .... ..... ....... .... . ....... DAILY FIELD NOTES SAN JOA COUNTY Landfill Gas Monitoring Well Installation Location: North County Sanitary Landfill Contractor., LFG Control Inc. CQA/Engineer Pete Holland, CEG Superintendent: Mark Penn (LFG) Prepared by: PH Submitted to: SJC Public Works Owner/Client: San Joaquin County Public Works Reviewed By: PH Project No: 03-16-0203-00 Day of Week: Tuesday Report Date: 7/28109 Time on Site: 7:30 am 7:30 am: Onsite. 8:00 am: Drillers began SG -13 (at new location 20ft south of original proposed location). 9:00 am: Natalia (Env. Health) arrives. 9:30 am: Natalia gets stuck near SG -16, calls me. Driller helper goes to help her get unstuck. 12:00 pm: Natalia leaves site. She inspected SG -15 (Frank's rig) but it's apparent that John's rig probably won't be done by 3:30 and therefore there won't be anything to inspect, I talked to Natalia about SG -11 1 being a foot off of the specified perforations and told her in my opinion the difference would have a negligible effect on the performance of the probe because the gravel pack was built per the plans and because the sandy soil encountered was relatively thick. She said she couldn't approve that unless it came from Mike Carroll/Joyesh (Solid Waste), Natalia also said that anything above ground is not a concern to her, she's here to see what goes underground. 3:30 pm: Drilling slow. Finished day, 70 ft drilled. 5 more ft to drill tomorrow. Joyesh (Sold Waste) visited the site in afternoon. I explained to him SG -11 and that my opinion was SG -11 I would function properly with one less foot of perforation I deep probe because gravel pack was built to design depth. Kevin (Public Works) called me and I explained to him the same thing. On the matter of the top of the deep probe only extending above ground surface 2 ft, I provided my opinion that the function of the probe would only be negligibly impacted with the shortened length, and that some of the options the contractor could consider would be to either make the monument shorter or put a fitting on the end of the probe to each the top of the monument. Mark later showed me a fitting he could attach to the top of the probe to make it reach the top of the monument. I said that looked OK, but he'd have to get approval from Kevin/Joyesh. 4:00 pm: Left site. I of I